mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accounting for Agreement Phenomena in Sentence Comprehension with Transformer Language Models: Effects of Similarity-based Interference on Surprisal and Attention

arXiv 2104.12874 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2021cs.CLcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We advance a novel explanation of similarity-based interference effects in subject-verb and reflexive pronoun agreement processing, grounded in surprisal values computed from a pretrained large-scale Transformer model, GPT-2. Specifically, we show that surprisal of the verb or reflexive pronoun predicts facilitatory interference effects in ungrammatical sentences, where a distractor noun that matches in number with the verb or pronoun leads to faster reading times, despite the distractor not participating in the agreement relation. We review the human empirical evidence for such effects, including recent meta-analyses and large-scale studies. We also show that attention patterns (indexed by entropy and other measures) in the Transformer show patterns of diffuse attention in the presence of similar distractors, consistent with cue-based retrieval models of parsing. But in contrast to these models, the attentional cues and memory representations are learned entirely from the simple self-supervised task of predicting the next word.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2021.

Builds on

14 of 47 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  3. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  4. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
  5. 2019A Multiscale Visualization of Attention in the Transformer Modelcited by 292
  6. 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 241
  7. 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 119
  8. 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 115
  9. 2019Attention in Natural Language Processingcited by 100
  10. 2020Syntactic Structure from Deep Learningcited by 99
  11. 2018What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?cited by 86
  12. 2020ConvoKit: A Toolkit for the Analysis of Conversationscited by 71
2 more
  1. 2018RNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependencycited by 23
  2. 2019What Syntactic Structures block Dependencies in RNN Language Models?cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 10.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
  2. 2023Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 92
  3. 2023A Language Model with Limited Memory Capacity Captures Interference in Human Sentence Processingcited by 22
  4. 2022Entropy- and Distance-Based Predictors From GPT-2 Attention Patterns Predict Reading Times Over and Above GPT-2 Surprisalcited by 14
  5. 2024Linear Recency Bias During Training Improves Transformers' Fit to Reading Timescited by 14
  6. 2024A Psycholinguistic Evaluation of Language Models' Sensitivity to Argument Rolescited by 14
  7. 2023Words, Subwords, and Morphemes: What Really Matters in the Surprisal-Reading Time Relationship?cited by 13
  8. 2024From Form(s) to Meaning: Probing the Semantic Depths of Language Models Using Multisense Consistencycited by 7
  9. 2024Revenge of the Fallen? Recurrent Models Match Transformers at Predicting Human Language Comprehension Metricscited by 6
  10. 2025If Attention Serves as a Cognitive Model of Human Memory Retrieval, What is the Plausible Memory Representation?cited by 4
  11. 2025Probing Syntax in Large Language Models: Successes and Remaining Challengescited by 4
  12. 2024What Makes Language Models Good-enough?cited by 2
14 more
  1. 2026Diverging Transformer Predictions for Human Sentence Processing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Agreement Attraction Effectscited by 2
  2. 2023Plausibility Processing in Transformer Language Models: Focusing on the Role of Attention Heads in GPTcited by 1
  3. 2023Predicting Human Translation Difficulty with Neural Machine Translationcited by 1
  4. 2025Uniform Information Density and Syntactic Reduction: Revisiting textitthat-Mentioning in English Complement Clausescited by 1
  5. 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
  6. 2026N-gram-like Language Models Predict Naturalistic Reading Time Bestcited by 1
  7. 2025Disaggregation Reveals Hidden Training Dynamics: The Case of Agreement Attractioncited by 0
  8. 2026Memory Retrieval in Transformers: Insights from The Encoding Specificity Principlecited by 0
  9. 2026Working Memory Constraints Scaffold Learning in Transformers under Data Scarcitycited by 0
  10. 2026A Dual-Task Paradigm to Investigate Sentence Comprehension Strategies in Language Modelscited by 0
  11. 2026Quantifying the cross-linguistic effects of syncretism on agreement attractioncited by 0
  12. 2026When Context Misleads: Surprisal, Energy and Attention Entropy as Metrics of Coherence Illusions in LLMscited by 0
  13. 2026Timesteps of Mamba Align with Human Reading Timescited by 0
  14. 2026Beyond Static and Linear: What Attention Constraints Best Fit Human Reading Times?cited by 0