mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

If Attention Serves as a Cognitive Model of Human Memory Retrieval, What is the Plausible Memory Representation?

arXiv 2502.11469 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work in computational psycholinguistics has revealed intriguing parallels between attention mechanisms and human memory retrieval, focusing primarily on vanilla Transformers that operate on token-level representations. However, computational psycholinguistic research has also established that syntactic structures provide compelling explanations for human sentence processing that token-level factors cannot fully account for. In this paper, we investigate whether the attention mechanism of Transformer Grammar (TG), which uniquely operates on syntactic structures as representational units, can serve as a cognitive model of human memory retrieval, using Normalized Attention Entropy (NAE) as a linking hypothesis between models and humans. Our experiments demonstrate that TG's attention achieves superior predictive power for self-paced reading times compared to vanilla Transformer's, with further analyses revealing independent contributions from both models. These findings suggest that human sentence processing involves dual memory representations -- one based on syntactic structures and another on token sequences -- with attention serving as the general memory retrieval algorithm, while highlighting the importance of incorporating syntactic structures as representational units.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

18 of 69 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  3. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,850
  4. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 199
  5. 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
  6. 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 119
  7. 2016Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 109
  8. 2020Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention?cited by 51
  9. 2018Finding Syntax in Human Encephalography with Beam Searchcited by 41
  10. 2024Leading Whitespaces of Language Models' Subword Vocabulary Pose a Confound for Calculating Word Probabilitiescited by 30
  11. 2021Accounting for Agreement Phenomena in Sentence Comprehension with Transformer Language Models: Effects of Similarity-based Interference on Surprisal and Attentioncited by 27
  12. 2017Effective Inference for Generative Neural Parsingcited by 25
6 more
  1. 2023A Language Model with Limited Memory Capacity Captures Interference in Human Sentence Processingcited by 22
  2. 2016What Do Recurrent Neural Network Grammars Learn About Syntax?cited by 15
  3. 2021Different kinds of cognitive plausibility: why are transformers better than RNNs at predicting N400 amplitude?cited by 14
  4. 2022Entropy- and Distance-Based Predictors From GPT-2 Attention Patterns Predict Reading Times Over and Above GPT-2 Surprisalcited by 14
  5. 2024On the Proper Treatment of Tokenization in Psycholinguisticscited by 13
  6. 2021Effective Batching for Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.