The Impact of Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Landscape-Aware Performance Regression and Algorithm Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated algorithm selection and configuration methods that build on exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) are becoming very popular in Evolutionary Computation. However, despite a significantly growing number of applications, the underlying machine learning models are often chosen in an ad-hoc manner. We show in this work that three classical regression methods are able to achieve meaningful results for ELA-based algorithm selection. For those three models -- random forests, decision trees, and bagging decision trees -- the quality of the regression models is highly impacted by the chosen hyper-parameters. This has significant effects also on the quality of the algorithm selectors that are built on top of these regressions. By comparing a total number of 30 different models, each coupled with 2 complementary regression strategies, we derive guidelines for the tuning of the regression models and provide general recommendations for a more systematic use of classical machine learning models in landscape-aware algorithm selection. We point out that a choice of the machine learning model merits to be carefully undertaken and further investigated.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023DoE2Vec: Deep-learning Based Features for Exploratory Landscape Analysiscited by 12
- 2021Explainable Landscape-Aware Optimization Performance Predictioncited by 5
- 2022The Importance of Landscape Features for Performance Prediction of Modular CMA-ES Variantscited by 5
- 2023PS-AAS: Portfolio Selection for Automated Algorithm Selection in Black-Box Optimizationcited by 5
- 2022Explainable Landscape Analysis in Automated Algorithm Performance Predictioncited by 3
- 2023RF+clust for Leave-One-Problem-Out Performance Predictioncited by 3
- 2024A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimizationcited by 3
- 2022Automated Algorithm Selection for Radar Network Configurationcited by 2
- 2023Sensitivity Analysis of RF+clust for Leave-one-problem-out Performance Predictioncited by 2
- 2024On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Settingcited by 0
- 2026Reinforcement learning to choose optimizerscited by 0
- 2026Reinforcement learning to choose optimizers1 Sep 2026
- 2024A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimization8 Jun 2024
- 2024On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Setting13 May 2024
- 2023PS-AAS: Portfolio Selection for Automated Algorithm Selection in Black-Box Optimization14 Oct 2023
- 2023Sensitivity Analysis of RF+clust for Leave-one-problem-out Performance Prediction30 May 2023
- 2023DoE2Vec: Deep-learning Based Features for Exploratory Landscape Analysis31 Mar 2023
- 2023RF+clust for Leave-One-Problem-Out Performance Prediction23 Jan 2023
- 2022Automated Algorithm Selection for Radar Network Configuration7 May 2022
- 2022The Importance of Landscape Features for Performance Prediction of Modular CMA-ES Variants15 Apr 2022
- 2022Explainable Landscape Analysis in Automated Algorithm Performance Prediction22 Mar 2022
- 2021Explainable Landscape-Aware Optimization Performance Prediction22 Oct 2021