Explainable Landscape-Aware Optimization Performance Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Efficient solving of an unseen optimization problem is related to appropriate selection of an optimization algorithm and its hyper-parameters. For this purpose, automated algorithm performance prediction should be performed that in most commonly-applied practices involves training a supervised ML algorithm using a set of problem landscape features. However, the main issue of training such models is their limited explainability since they only provide information about the joint impact of the set of landscape features to the end prediction results. In this study, we are investigating explainable landscape-aware regression models where the contribution of each landscape feature to the prediction of the optimization algorithm performance is estimated on a global and local level. The global level provides information about the impact of the feature across all benchmark problems' instances, while the local level provides information about the impact on a specific problem instance. The experimental results are obtained using the COCO benchmark problems and three differently configured modular CMA-ESs. The results show a proof of concept that different set of features are important for different problem instances, which indicates that further personalization of the landscape space is required when training an automated algorithm performance prediction model.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2021.
Builds on
13 of 32 references.
References · 13
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 135
- 2018Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectivescited by 111
- 2017Automated Algorithm Selection on Continuous Black-Box Problems By Combining Exploratory Landscape Analysis and Machine Learningcited by 33
- 2017Comprehensive Feature-Based Landscape Analysis of Continuous and Constrained Optimization Problems Using the R-Package flaccocited by 27
- 2021Tuning as a Means of Assessing the Benefits of New Ideas in Interplay with Existing Algorithmic Modulescited by 20
- 2020Landscape-Aware Fixed-Budget Performance Regression and Algorithm Selection for Modular CMA-ES Variantscited by 15
- 2021Towards Feature-Based Performance Regression Using Trajectory Datacited by 15
- 2021Towards Explainable Exploratory Landscape Analysis: Extreme Feature Selection for Classifying BBOB Functionscited by 14
- 2021The Impact of Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Landscape-Aware Performance Regression and Algorithm Selectioncited by 11
- 2020Towards Dynamic Algorithm Selection for Numerical Black-Box Optimization: Investigating BBOB as a Use Casecited by 5
- 2021Personalizing Performance Regression Models to Black-Box Optimization Problemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Explainable Benchmarking for Iterative Optimization Heuristicscited by 10
- 2022The Importance of Landscape Features for Performance Prediction of Modular CMA-ES Variantscited by 5
- 2022Explainable Landscape Analysis in Automated Algorithm Performance Predictioncited by 3
- 2024Evolutionary Computation and Explainable AI: A Roadmap to Understandable Intelligent Systemscited by 2
- 2025Geometric Learning in Black-Box Optimization: A GNN Framework for Algorithm Performance Predictioncited by 1
- 2025Geometric Learning in Black-Box Optimization: A GNN Framework for Algorithm Performance Prediction19 Jun 2025
- 2024Evolutionary Computation and Explainable AI: A Roadmap to Understandable Intelligent Systems12 Jun 2024
- 2024Explainable Benchmarking for Iterative Optimization Heuristics31 Jan 2024
- 2022The Importance of Landscape Features for Performance Prediction of Modular CMA-ES Variants15 Apr 2022
- 2022Explainable Landscape Analysis in Automated Algorithm Performance Prediction22 Mar 2022