RF+clust for Leave-One-Problem-Out Performance Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Per-instance automated algorithm configuration and selection are gaining significant moments in evolutionary computation in recent years. Two crucial, sometimes implicit, ingredients for these automated machine learning (AutoML) methods are 1) feature-based representations of the problem instances and 2) performance prediction methods that take the features as input to estimate how well a specific algorithm instance will perform on a given problem instance. Non-surprisingly, common machine learning models fail to make predictions for instances whose feature-based representation is underrepresented or not covered in the training data, resulting in poor generalization ability of the models for problems not seen during training.In this work, we study leave-one-problem-out (LOPO) performance prediction. We analyze whether standard random forest (RF) model predictions can be improved by calibrating them with a weighted average of performance values obtained by the algorithm on problem instances that are sufficiently close to the problem for which a performance prediction is sought, measured by cosine similarity in feature space. While our RF+clust approach obtains more accurate performance prediction for several problems, its predictive power crucially depends on the chosen similarity threshold as well as on the feature portfolio for which the cosine similarity is measured, thereby opening a new angle for feature selection in a zero-shot learning setting, as LOPO is termed in machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2023.
Builds on
8 of 28 references.
References · 8
- 2015A Random Forest Guided Tourcited by 168
- 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 135
- 2022Per-run Algorithm Selection with Warm-starting using Trajectory-based Featurescited by 20
- 2020Landscape-Aware Fixed-Budget Performance Regression and Algorithm Selection for Modular CMA-ES Variantscited by 15
- 2021The Impact of Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Landscape-Aware Performance Regression and Algorithm Selectioncited by 11
- 2022SELECTOR: Selecting a Representative Benchmark Suite for Reproducible Statistical Comparisoncited by 11
- 2021Personalizing Performance Regression Models to Black-Box Optimization Problemscited by 4
- 2018A new Taxonomy of Continuous Global Optimization Algorithmscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023MA-BBOB: Many-Affine Combinations of BBOB Functions for Evaluating AutoML Approaches in Noiseless Numerical Black-Box Optimization Contextscited by 7
- 2024A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Sensitivity Analysis of RF+clust for Leave-one-problem-out Performance Predictioncited by 2
- 2024A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimization8 Jun 2024
- 2023MA-BBOB: Many-Affine Combinations of BBOB Functions for Evaluating AutoML Approaches in Noiseless Numerical Black-Box Optimization Contexts18 Jun 2023
- 2023Sensitivity Analysis of RF+clust for Leave-one-problem-out Performance Prediction30 May 2023