mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Making Attention Mechanisms More Robust and Interpretable with Virtual Adversarial Training

arXiv 2104.08763 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although attention mechanisms have become fundamental components of deep learning models, they are vulnerable to perturbations, which may degrade the prediction performance and model interpretability. Adversarial training (AT) for attention mechanisms has successfully reduced such drawbacks by considering adversarial perturbations. However, this technique requires label information, and thus, its use is limited to supervised settings. In this study, we explore the concept of incorporating virtual AT (VAT) into the attention mechanisms, by which adversarial perturbations can be computed even from unlabeled data. To realize this approach, we propose two general training techniques, namely VAT for attention mechanisms (Attention VAT) and "interpretable" VAT for attention mechanisms (Attention iVAT), which extend AT for attention mechanisms to a semi-supervised setting. In particular, Attention iVAT focuses on the differences in attention; thus, it can efficiently learn clearer attention and improve model interpretability, even with unlabeled data. Empirical experiments based on six public datasets revealed that our techniques provide better prediction performance than conventional AT-based as well as VAT-based techniques, and stronger agreement with evidence that is provided by humans in detecting important words in sentences. Moreover, our proposal offers these advantages without needing to add the careful selection of unlabeled data. That is, even if the model using our VAT-based technique is trained on unlabeled data from a source other than the target task, both the prediction performance and model interpretability can be improved.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2021.

Builds on

31 of 47 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  7. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  8. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  9. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  10. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  11. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  12. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
19 more
  1. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
  2. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  3. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  4. 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
  5. 2017A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embeddingcited by 318
  6. 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 302
  7. 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
  8. 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
  9. 2016A Decomposable Attention Model for Natural Language Inferencecited by 214
  10. 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 164
  11. 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
  12. 2019AllenNLP Interpret: A Framework for Explaining Predictions of NLP Modelscited by 74
  13. 2018Interpretable Adversarial Perturbation in Input Embedding Space for Textcited by 67
  14. 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 63
  15. 2018Did the Model Understand the Question?cited by 60
  16. 2020Towards Transparent and Explainable Attention Modelscited by 47
  17. 2017Robust Multilingual Part-of-Speech Tagging via Adversarial Trainingcited by 21
  18. 2020Attention Meets Perturbations: Robust and Interpretable Attention with Adversarial Trainingcited by 12
  19. 2016Character-Level Question Answering with Attentioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

8 papers.