mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Human-Understandable Visual Explanations:Imperceptible High-frequency Cues Can Better Be Removed

arXiv 2104.07954 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2021cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI (XAI) methods focus on explaining what a neural network has learned - in other words, identifying the features that are the most influential to the prediction. In this paper, we call them "distinguishing features". However, whether a human can make sense of the generated explanation also depends on the perceptibility of these features to humans. To make sure an explanation is human-understandable, we argue that the capabilities of humans, constrained by the Human Visual System (HVS) and psychophysics, need to be taken into account. We propose the em human perceptibility principle for XAI, stating that, to generate human-understandable explanations, neural networks should be steered towards focusing on human-understandable cues during training. We conduct a case study regarding the classification of real vs. fake face images, where many of the distinguishing features picked up by standard neural networks turn out not to be perceptible to humans. By applying the proposed principle, a neural network with human-understandable explanations is trained which, in a user study, is shown to better align with human intuition. This is likely to make the AI more trustworthy and opens the door to humans learning from machines. In the case study, we specifically investigate and analyze the behaviour of the human-imperceptible high spatial frequency features in neural networks and XAI methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2021.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  6. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  7. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  8. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  9. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  10. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  11. 2019MaskGAN: Towards Diverse and Interactive Facial Image Manipulationcited by 628
  12. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
9 more
  1. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  2. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
  3. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  4. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
  5. 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
  6. 2020Evaluating Weakly Supervised Object Localization Methods Rightcited by 105
  7. 2019Unmasking DeepFakes with simple Featurescited by 78
  8. 2017Visual Explanation by Interpretation: Improving Visual Feedback Capabilities of Deep Neural Networkscited by 28
  9. 2016A Taxonomy and Library for Visualizing Learned Features in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.