mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can a Transformer Pass the Wug Test? Tuning Copying Bias in Neural Morphological Inflection Models

arXiv 2104.06483 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2021cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning sequence models have been successfully applied to the task of morphological inflection. The results of the SIGMORPHON shared tasks in the past several years indicate that such models can perform well, but only if the training data cover a good amount of different lemmata, or if the lemmata that are inflected at test time have also been seen in training, as has indeed been largely the case in these tasks. Surprisingly, standard models such as the Transformer almost completely fail at generalizing inflection patterns when asked to inflect previously unseen lemmata -- i.e. under "wug test"-like circumstances. While established data augmentation techniques can be employed to alleviate this shortcoming by introducing a copying bias through hallucinating synthetic new word forms using the alphabet in the language at hand, we show that, to be more effective, the hallucination process needs to pay attention to substrings of syllable-like length rather than individual characters or stems. We report a significant performance improvement with our substring-based hallucination model over previous data hallucination methods when training and test data do not overlap in their lemmata.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  3. 2019The SIGMORPHON 2019 Shared Task: Morphological Analysis in Context and Cross-Lingual Transfer for Inflectioncited by 43
  4. 2020Applying the Transformer to Character-level Transductioncited by 43
  5. 2018The CoNLL--SIGMORPHON 2018 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflectioncited by 41
  6. 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
  7. 2018UniMorph 2.0: Universal Morphologycited by 40
  8. 2020SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task 0: Typologically Diverse Morphological Inflectioncited by 39
  9. 2019Pushing the Limits of Low-Resource Morphological Inflectioncited by 29
  10. 2019Exact Hard Monotonic Attention for Character-Level Transductioncited by 22
  11. 2018Hard Non-Monotonic Attention for Character-Level Transductioncited by 12
  12. 2018Imitation Learning for Neural Morphological String Transductioncited by 10
2 more
  1. 2017Unlabeled Data for Morphological Generation With Character-Based Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 5
  2. 2017Align and Copy: UZH at SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task for Morphological Reinflectioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: