mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Investigation of Noise in Morphological Inflection

arXiv 2305.16581 ↗First posted 26 May 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With a growing focus on morphological inflection systems for languages where high-quality data is scarce, training data noise is a serious but so far largely ignored concern. We aim at closing this gap by investigating the types of noise encountered within a pipeline for truly unsupervised morphological paradigm completion and its impact on morphological inflection systems: First, we propose an error taxonomy and annotation pipeline for inflection training data. Then, we compare the effect of different types of noise on multiple state-of-the-art inflection models. Finally, we propose a novel character-level masked language modeling (CMLM) pretraining objective and explore its impact on the models' resistance to noise. Our experiments show that various architectures are impacted differently by separate types of noise, but encoder-decoders tend to be more robust to noise than models trained with a copy bias. CMLM pretraining helps transformers, but has lower impact on LSTMs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  5. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  6. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  7. 2018MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Textcited by 54
  8. 2020Applying the Transformer to Character-level Transductioncited by 43
  9. 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
  10. 2020SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task 0: Typologically Diverse Morphological Inflectioncited by 39
  11. 2021(Un)solving Morphological Inflection: Lemma Overlap Artificially Inflates Models' Performancecited by 20
  12. 2015Morphological Inflection Generation Using Character Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 14
9 more
  1. 2021Can a Transformer Pass the Wug Test? Tuning Copying Bias in Neural Morphological Inflection Modelscited by 13
  2. 2016Single-Model Encoder-Decoder with Explicit Morphological Representation for Reinflectioncited by 12
  3. 2018Imitation Learning for Neural Morphological String Transductioncited by 10
  4. 2020Unsupervised Morphological Paradigm Completioncited by 8
  5. 2020The Paradigm Discovery Problemcited by 6
  6. 2017Unlabeled Data for Morphological Generation With Character-Based Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 5
  7. 2017Align and Copy: UZH at SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task for Morphological Reinflectioncited by 5
  8. 2020The SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task on Unsupervised Morphological Paradigm Completioncited by 4
  9. 2022Morphological Processing of Low-Resource Languages: Where We Are and What's Nextcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.