Character-aware Transformers Learn an Irregular Morphological Pattern Yet None Generalize Like Humans
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Whether neural networks can serve as cognitive models of morphological learning remains an open question. Recent work has shown that encoder-decoder models can acquire irregular patterns, but evidence that they generalize these patterns like humans is mixed. We investigate this using the Spanish L-shaped morphome, where only the first-person singular indicative (e.g., textitpongo `I put') shares its stem with all subjunctive forms (e.g., textitponga, pongas) despite lacking apparent phonological, semantic, or syntactic motivation. We compare five encoder-decoder transformers varying along two dimensions: sequential vs. position-invariant positional encoding, and atomic vs. decomposed tag representations. Positional encoding proves decisive: position-invariant models recover the correct L-shaped paradigm clustering even when L-shaped verbs are scarce in training, whereas sequential positional encoding models only partially capture the pattern. Yet none of the models productively generalize this pattern to novel forms. Position-invariant models generalize the L-shaped stem across subjunctive cells but fail to extend it to the first-person singular indicative, producing a mood-based generalization rather than the L-shaped morphomic pattern. Humans do the opposite, generalizing preferentially to the first-person singular indicative over subjunctive forms. None of the models reproduce the human pattern, highlighting the gap between statistical pattern reproduction and morphological abstraction.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 44 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
- 2022Transformer Language Models without Positional Encodings Still Learn Positional Informationcited by 148
- 2021Position Information in Transformers: An Overviewcited by 103
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
- 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 86
- 2020What Do Position Embeddings Learn? An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Language Model Positional Encodingcited by 52
- 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
- 2020Applying the Transformer to Character-level Transductioncited by 43
- 2018The CoNLL--SIGMORPHON 2018 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflectioncited by 41
10 more
- 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
- 2019Pushing the Limits of Low-Resource Morphological Inflectioncited by 29
- 2018Recurrent Neural Networks in Linguistic Theory: Revisiting Pinker and Prince (1988) and the Past Tense Debatecited by 27
- 2021(Un)solving Morphological Inflection: Lemma Overlap Artificially Inflates Models' Performancecited by 20
- 2019Are we there yet? Encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models of English past tense inflectioncited by 13
- 2020Inflecting when there's no majority: Limitations of encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models for German pluralscited by 13
- 2021Can a Transformer Pass the Wug Test? Tuning Copying Bias in Neural Morphological Inflection Modelscited by 13
- 2016Single-Model Encoder-Decoder with Explicit Morphological Representation for Reinflectioncited by 12
- 2016Neural Multi-Source Morphological Reinflectioncited by 7
- 2024Frequency matters: Modeling irregular morphological patterns in Spanish with Transformerscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.