Certified Control: An Architecture for Verifiable Safety of Autonomous Vehicles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Widespread adoption of autonomous cars will require greater confidence in their safety than is currently possible. Certified control is a new safety architecture whose goal is two-fold: to achieve a very high level of safety, and to provide a framework for justifiable confidence in that safety. The key idea is a runtime monitor that acts, along with sensor hardware and low-level control and actuators, as a small trusted base, ensuring the safety of the system as a whole. Unfortunately, in current systems complex perception makes the verification even of a runtime monitor challenging. Unlike traditional runtime monitoring, therefore, a certified control monitor does not perform perception and analysis itself. Instead, the main controller assembles evidence that the proposed action is safe into a certificate that is then checked independently by the monitor. This exploits the classic gap between the costs of finding and checking. The controller is assigned the task of finding the certificate, and can thus use the most sophisticated algorithms available (including learning-enabled software); the monitor is assigned only the task of checking, and can thus run quickly and be smaller and formally verifiable. This paper explains the key ideas of certified control and illustrates them with a certificate for LiDAR data and its formal verification. It shows how the architecture dramatically reduces the amount of code to be verified, providing an end-to-end safety analysis that would likely not be achievable in a traditional architecture.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Architecting Safer Autonomous Aviation Systemscited by 1
- 2023Certified Control for Train Sign Classificationcited by 1
- 2024Outline of an Independent Systematic Blackbox Test for ML-based Systemscited by 1
- 2024Using Formal Models, Safety Shields and Certified Control to Validate AI-Based Train Systemscited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic Modelling of Operational Design Domains, A New Approach for Testing AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic Modelling of Operational Design Domains, A New Approach for Testing AI Systems21 Sep 2026
- 2024Using Formal Models, Safety Shields and Certified Control to Validate AI-Based Train Systems21 Nov 2024
- 2024Outline of an Independent Systematic Blackbox Test for ML-based Systems30 Jan 2024
- 2023Certified Control for Train Sign Classification16 Nov 2023
- 2023Architecting Safer Autonomous Aviation Systems9 Jan 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026RISC-V Functional Safety for Autonomous Automotive Systems: An Analytical Framework and Research Roadmap for ML-Assisted Certification
- 2021Complete Test of Synthesised Safety Supervisors for Robots and Autonomous Systems ↗
- 2024Safety Verification and Navigation for Autonomous Vehicles based on Signal Temporal Logic Constraints
- 2026Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: A Real-Time Motion Planning Algorithm on Embedded Hardware
- 2023Physical Backdoor Trigger Activation of Autonomous Vehicle using Reachability Analysis
- 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs
- 2021Runtime Safety Assurance for Learning-enabled Control of Autonomous Driving Vehicles
- 2021Towards Safe, Explainable, and Regulated Autonomous Driving