mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safety Verification and Navigation for Autonomous Vehicles based on Signal Temporal Logic Constraints

arXiv 2409.10689 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2024eess.SY cs.RO cs.SYcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Reinforcement learning for driving

Abstract (arXiv)

The software architecture behind modern autonomous vehicles (AV) is becoming more complex steadily. Safety verification is now an imminent task prior to the large-scale deployment of such convoluted models. For safety-critical tasks in navigation, it becomes imperative to perform a verification procedure on the trajectories proposed by the planning algorithm prior to deployment. Signal Temporal Logic (STL) constraints can dictate the safety requirements for an AV. A combination of STL constraints is called a specification. A key difference between STL and other logic constraints is that STL allows us to work on continuous signals. We verify the satisfaction of the STL specifications by calculating the robustness value for each signal within the specification. Higher robustness values indicate a safer system. Model Predictive Control (MPC) is one of the most widely used methods to control the navigation of an AV, with an underlying set of state and input constraints. Our research aims to formulate and test an MPC controller, with STL specifications as constraints, that can safely navigate an AV. The primary goal of the cost function is to minimize the control inputs. STL constraints will act as an additional layer of constraints that would change based on the scenario and task on hand. We propose using sTaliro, a MATLAB-based robustness calculator for STL specifications, formulated in a receding horizon control fashion for an AV navigation task. It inputs a simplified AV state space model and a set of STL specifications, for which it constructs a closed-loop controller. We test out our controller for different test cases/scenarios and verify the safe navigation of our AV model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 4 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.

Builds on

4 of 19 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015Robust Temporal Logic Model Predictive Controlcited by 21
  2. 2014On-Line Monitoring for Temporal Logic Robustnesscited by 15
  3. 2016An MILP Approach for Real-time Optimal Controller Synthesis with Metric Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 4
  4. 2017Robust Motion Planning employing Signal Temporal Logiccited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Safety Reinforced Model Predictive Control (SRMPC): Improving MPC with Reinforcement Learning for Motion Planning in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2025LVLM-MPC Collaboration for Autonomous Driving: A Safety-Aware and Task-Scalable Control Architecture
  3. 2026Conformal Signal Temporal Logic for Robust Reinforcement Learning Control: A Case Study
  4. 2026Shielded Reinforcement Learning Under Dynamic Temporal Logic Constraints
  5. 2026Efficient Hybrid Hard--Soft Signal Temporal Logic MPC for Driving under Multimodal Uncertainty
  6. 2026Reward Machines for Signal Temporal Logic
  7. 2026From Language to Logic: A Theoretical Architecture for VLM-Grounded Safe Navigation ↗
  8. 2025Signal Temporal Logic Compliant Co-design of Planning and Control ↗