mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RISC-V Functional Safety for Autonomous Automotive Systems: An Analytical Framework and Research Roadmap for ML-Assisted Certification

arXiv 2604.17391 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2026cs.SE cs.AR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

RISC-V is emerging as a viable platform for automotive-grade embedded computing, with recent ISO 26262 ASIL-D certifications demonstrating readiness for safety-critical deployment in autonomous driving systems. However, functional safety in automotive systems is fundamentally a certification problem rather than a processor problem. The dominant costs arise from diagnostic coverage analysis, toolchain qualification, fault injection campaigns, safety-case generation, and compliance with ISO 26262, ISO 21448 (SOTIF), and ISO/SAE 21434. This paper analyzes the role of RISC-V in automotive functional safety, focusing on ISA openness, formal verifiability, custom extension control, debug transparency, and vendor-independent qualification. We examine autonomous driving safety requirements and map them to RISC-V architectural challenges such as lockstep execution, safety islands, mixed-criticality isolation, and secure debug. Rather than proposing a single algorithmic breakthrough, we present an analytical framework and research roadmap centered on certification economics as the primary optimization objective. We also discuss how selected ML methods, including LLM-assisted FMEDA generation, knowledge-graph-based safety case automation, reinforcement learning for fault injection, and graph neural networks for diagnostic coverage, can support certification workflows. We argue that the strongest outcome is not a faster core, but an ASIL-D-ready certifiable RISC-V platform.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.

Builds on

6 of 27 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Softwarecited by 26
  2. 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
  3. 2018Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software: An Assessment and Adaption of Software Process Requirements in ISO 26262cited by 13
  4. 2024Key Safety Design Overview in AI-driven Autonomous Vehiclescited by 4
  5. 2023Towards a RISC-V Open Platform for Next-generation Automotive ECUscited by 2
  6. 2018On the Application of ISO 26262 in Control Design for Automated Vehiclescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: A Real-Time Motion Planning Algorithm on Embedded Hardware
  2. 2026Extending Responsibility-Sensitive Safety for the Assessment of Offloaded Autonomous Driving Services ↗
  3. 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs
  4. 2025Safety2Drive: Safety-Critical Scenario Benchmark for the Evaluation of Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Hierarchical Fault Localization for Autonomous Driving Systems with Hypothesis Validation and Intent Analysis ↗
  6. 2026Safe-SDL:Establishing Safety Boundaries and Control Mechanisms for AI-Driven Self-Driving Laboratories
  7. 2023SAFR-AV: Safety Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles using Real World Data -- An end-to-end solution for real world data driven scenario-based testing for pre-certification of AV stacks
  8. 2025Large Language Models in Code Co-generation for Safe Autonomous Vehicles