mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Two-stage training algorithm for AI robot soccer

arXiv 2104.05931 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2021cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In multi-agent reinforcement learning, the cooperative learning behavior of agents is very important. In the field of heterogeneous multi-agent reinforcement learning, cooperative behavior among different types of agents in a group is pursued. Learning a joint-action set during centralized training is an attractive way to obtain such cooperative behavior, however, this method brings limited learning performance with heterogeneous agents. To improve the learning performance of heterogeneous agents during centralized training, two-stage heterogeneous centralized training which allows the training of multiple roles of heterogeneous agents is proposed. During training, two training processes are conducted in a series. One of the two stages is to attempt training each agent according to its role, aiming at the maximization of individual role rewards. The other is for training the agents as a whole to make them learn cooperative behaviors while attempting to maximize shared collective rewards, e.g., team rewards. Because these two training processes are conducted in a series in every timestep, agents can learn how to maximize role rewards and team rewards simultaneously. The proposed method is applied to 5 versus 5 AI robot soccer for validation. Simulation results show that the proposed method can train the robots of the robot soccer team effectively, achieving higher role rewards and higher team rewards as compared to other approaches that can be used to solve problems of training cooperative multi-agent.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.

Builds on

24 of 44 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,290
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,221
  4. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,352
  5. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,223
  6. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,525
  7. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,104
  8. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,093
  9. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,010
  10. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 772
  11. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 739
  12. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 622
12 more
  1. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 592
  2. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 493
  3. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
  4. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 459
  5. 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 406
  6. 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 302
  7. 2017A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 265
  8. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning framework for Autonomous Drivingcited by 224
  9. 2019Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Large-scale Traffic Signal Controlcited by 159
  10. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Systems: A Review of Challenges, Solutions and Applicationscited by 122
  11. 2019CityFlow: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Environment for Large Scale City Traffic Scenariocited by 115
  12. 2019Emergent Coordination Through Competitioncited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.