Model LineUpper: Supporting Interactive Model Comparison at Multiple Levels for AutoML
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) is a rapidly growing set of technologies that automate the model development pipeline by searching model space and generating candidate models. A critical, final step of AutoML is human selection of a final model from dozens of candidates. In current AutoML systems, selection is supported only by performance metrics. Prior work has shown that in practice, people evaluate ML models based on additional criteria, such as the way a model makes predictions. Comparison may happen at multiple levels, from types of errors, to feature importance, to how the model makes predictions of specific instances. We developed tool to support interactive model comparison for AutoML by integrating multiple Explainable AI (XAI) and visualization techniques. We conducted a user study in which we both evaluated the system and used it as a technology probe to understand how users perform model comparison in an AutoML system. We discuss design implications for utilizing XAI techniques for model comparison and supporting the unique needs of data scientists in comparing AutoML models.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2021.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
References · 14
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
- 2017ActiVis: Visual Exploration of Industry-Scale Deep Neural Network Modelscited by 56
- 2018Manifold: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Interpretation and Diagnosis of Machine Learning Modelscited by 50
- 2019An ADMM Based Framework for AutoML Pipeline Configurationcited by 47
- 2021AutoDS: Towards Human-Centered Automation of Data Sciencecited by 32
- 2019How Data Scientists Work Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations: To Find The Right Answer Or To Ask The Right Question?cited by 30
- 2021How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Studycited by 29
- 2019AutoAIViz: Opening the Blackbox of Automated Artificial Intelligence with Conditional Parallel Coordinatescited by 24
- 2019ATMSeer: Increasing Transparency and Controllability in Automated Machine Learningcited by 23
- 2021How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want?cited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
- 2022Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AIcited by 40
- 2023Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AIcited by 29
- 2022Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIcited by 20
- 2024Position: A Call to Action for a Human-Centered AutoML Paradigmcited by 14
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 8
- 2023AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectationscited by 8
- 2023Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers? An Interview Study on Human-AI Collaboration in Data Storytellingcited by 7
- 2024How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Surveycited by 5
- 2024Compress and Compare: Interactively Evaluating Efficiency and Behavior Across ML Model Compression Experimentscited by 4
- 2022IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summariescited by 1
- 2025Interpretable by Design: MH-AutoML for Transparent and Efficient Android Malware Detection without Compromising Performancecited by 0
- 2025Interpretable by Design: MH-AutoML for Transparent and Efficient Android Malware Detection without Compromising Performance29 Jun 2025
- 2024Compress and Compare: Interactively Evaluating Efficiency and Behavior Across ML Model Compression Experiments6 Aug 2024
- 2024Position: A Call to Action for a Human-Centered AutoML Paradigm5 Jun 2024
- 2024How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey21 Mar 2024
- 2023Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers? An Interview Study on Human-AI Collaboration in Data Storytelling17 Apr 2023
- 2023AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations21 Feb 2023
- 2023Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AI23 Jan 2023
- 2022Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI12 Nov 2022
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunities17 Oct 2022
- 2022Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI22 Jun 2022
- 2022IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summaries26 Jan 2022
- 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences20 Oct 2021