mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable by Design: MH-AutoML for Transparent and Efficient Android Malware Detection without Compromising Performance

arXiv 2506.23314 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Malware detection in Android systems requires both cybersecurity expertise and machine learning (ML) techniques. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has emerged as an approach to simplify ML development by reducing the need for specialized knowledge. However, current AutoML solutions typically operate as black-box systems with limited transparency, interpretability, and experiment traceability. To address these limitations, we present MH-AutoML, a domain-specific framework for Android malware detection. MH-AutoML automates the entire ML pipeline, including data preprocessing, feature engineering, algorithm selection, and hyperparameter tuning. The framework incorporates capabilities for interpretability, debugging, and experiment tracking that are often missing in general-purpose solutions. In this study, we compare MH-AutoML against seven established AutoML frameworks: Auto-Sklearn, AutoGluon, TPOT, HyperGBM, Auto-PyTorch, LightAutoML, and MLJAR. Results show that MH-AutoML achieves better recall rates while providing more transparency and control. The framework maintains computational efficiency comparable to other solutions, making it suitable for cybersecurity applications where both performance and explainability matter.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2025.

Builds on

24 of 73 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
  5. 2020On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practicecited by 182
  6. 2024AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLcited by 87
  7. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
  8. 2020Auto-PyTorch Tabular: Multi-Fidelity MetaLearning for Efficient and Robust AutoDLcited by 67
  9. 2020AutoML to Date and Beyond: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 63
  10. 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
  11. 2021LightAutoML: AutoML Solution for a Large Financial Services Ecosystemcited by 32
  12. 2022AutoML for Deep Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 29
12 more
  1. 2019Towards Automated Machine Learning: Evaluation and Comparison of AutoML Approaches and Toolscited by 25
  2. 2019Ludwig: a type-based declarative deep learning toolboxcited by 24
  3. 2023Can Fairness be Automated? Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoMLcited by 16
  4. 2021Model LineUpper: Supporting Interactive Model Comparison at Multiple Levels for AutoMLcited by 12
  5. 2022XAutoML: A Visual Analytics Tool for Understanding and Validating Automated Machine Learningcited by 8
  6. 2022Building Domain-Specific Machine Learning Workflows: A Conceptual Framework for the State-of-the-Practicecited by 8
  7. 2024Data Pipeline Training: Integrating AutoML to Optimize the Data Flow of Machine Learning Modelscited by 5
  8. 2022Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Precepts, Methods, and Opportunities for Research in Constructioncited by 4
  9. 2024Embracing Diversity: Interpretable Zero-shot classification beyond one vector per classcited by 2
  10. 2025AutoML for Multi-Class Anomaly Compensation of Sensor Driftcited by 2
  11. 2020NASirt: AutoML based learning with instance-level complexity informationcited by 1
  12. 2023DREAM: Debugging and Repairing AutoML Pipelinescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.