mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations

arXiv 2302.10827 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2023cs.HC cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated machine learning (AutoML) is envisioned to make ML techniques accessible to ordinary users. Recent work has investigated the role of humans in enhancing AutoML functionality throughout a standard ML workflow. However, it is also critical to understand how users adopt existing AutoML solutions in complex, real-world settings from a holistic perspective. To fill this gap, this study conducted semi-structured interviews of AutoML users (N=19) focusing on understanding (1) the limitations of AutoML encountered by users in their real-world practices, (2) the strategies users adopt to cope with such limitations, and (3) how the limitations and workarounds impact their use of AutoML. Our findings reveal that users actively exercise user agency to overcome three major challenges arising from customizability, transparency, and privacy. Furthermore, users make cautious decisions about whether and how to apply AutoML on a case-by-case basis. Finally, we derive design implications for developing future AutoML solutions.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.

Builds on

27 of 95 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  4. 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 409
  5. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
  6. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 251
  7. 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 165
  8. 2020KRISP: Integrating Implicit and Symbolic Knowledge for Open-Domain Knowledge-Based VQAcited by 124
  9. 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
  10. 2019FLAML: A Fast and Lightweight AutoML Librarycited by 104
  11. 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
  12. 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 74
15 more
  1. 2020AutoML to Date and Beyond: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 63
  2. 2019Augmenting Neural Networks with First-order Logiccited by 51
  3. 2018Stakeholders in Explainable AIcited by 48
  4. 2020Trust in AutoML: Exploring Information Needs for Establishing Trust in Automated Machine Learning Systemscited by 36
  5. 2021AutoDS: Towards Human-Centered Automation of Data Sciencecited by 32
  6. 2019AutoAIViz: Opening the Blackbox of Automated Artificial Intelligence with Conditional Parallel Coordinatescited by 24
  7. 2020Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projectscited by 24
  8. 2019ATMSeer: Increasing Transparency and Controllability in Automated Machine Learningcited by 23
  9. 2021Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning Workflowscited by 22
  10. 2021Fits and Starts: Enterprise Use of AutoML and the Role of Humans in the Loopcited by 21
  11. 2021How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want?cited by 20
  12. 2022Learning Backward Compatible Embeddingscited by 16
  13. 2019Automated Machine Learning in Practice: State of the Art and Recent Resultscited by 12
  14. 2021Model LineUpper: Supporting Interactive Model Comparison at Multiple Levels for AutoMLcited by 12
  15. 2021On the Security Risks of AutoMLcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.