mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pareto Efficient Fairness in Supervised Learning: From Extraction to Tracing

arXiv 2104.01634 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As algorithmic decision-making systems are becoming more pervasive, it is crucial to ensure such systems do not become mechanisms of unfair discrimination on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, etc. Moreover, due to the inherent trade-off between fairness measures and accuracy, it is desirable to learn fairness-enhanced models without significantly compromising the accuracy. In this paper, we propose Pareto efficient Fairness (PEF) as a suitable fairness notion for supervised learning, that can ensure the optimal trade-off between overall loss and other fairness criteria. The proposed PEF notion is definition-agnostic, meaning that any well-defined notion of fairness can be reduced to the PEF notion. To efficiently find a PEF classifier, we cast the fairness-enhanced classification as a bilevel optimization problem and propose a gradient-based method that can guarantee the solution belongs to the Pareto frontier with provable guarantees for convex and non-convex objectives. We also generalize the proposed algorithmic solution to extract and trace arbitrary solutions from the Pareto frontier for a given preference over accuracy and fairness measures. This approach is generic and can be generalized to any multicriteria optimization problem to trace points on the Pareto frontier curve, which is interesting by its own right. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the PEF solution and the extracted Pareto frontier on real-world datasets compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2021.

Builds on

34 of 71 references.

References · 34

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  7. 2019Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradientscited by 523
  8. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  9. 2018Bilevel Programming for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learningcited by 403
  10. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  11. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
  12. 2018Approximation Methods for Bilevel Programmingcited by 231
22 more
  1. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  2. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  3. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  4. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
  5. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  6. 2019On the Convergence Theory of Gradient-Based Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 132
  7. 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
  8. 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
  9. 2017From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classificationcited by 60
  10. 2020Efficient Continuous Pareto Exploration in Multi-Task Learningcited by 57
  11. 2019Recovering from Biased Data: Can Fairness Constraints Improve Accuracy?cited by 50
  12. 2019Average Individual Fairness: Algorithms, Generalization and Experimentscited by 46
  13. 2017A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Marketcited by 44
  14. 2018Fairness Under Compositioncited by 43
  15. 2019The Disparate Equilibria of Algorithmic Decision Making when Individuals Invest Rationallycited by 41
  16. 2019Fair Classification and Social Welfarecited by 40
  17. 2018Downstream Effects of Affirmative Actioncited by 34
  18. 2019Efficient Fair Principal Component Analysiscited by 20
  19. 2019What is Fair? Exploring Pareto-Efficiency for Fairness Constrained Classifierscited by 12
  20. 2016Gradient-Based Multiobjective Optimization with Uncertaintiescited by 11
  21. 2020FACT: A Diagnostic for Group Fairness Trade-offscited by 4
  22. 2017Does mitigating ML's impact disparity require treatment disparity?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.