mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Bayesian Approach to Identifying Representational Errors

arXiv 2103.15171 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2021cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trained AI systems and expert decision makers can make errors that are often difficult to identify and understand. Determining the root cause for these errors can improve future decisions. This work presents Generative Error Model (GEM), a generative model for inferring representational errors based on observations of an actor's behavior (either simulated agent, robot, or human). The model considers two sources of error: those that occur due to representational limitations -- "blind spots" -- and non-representational errors, such as those caused by noise in execution or systematic errors present in the actor's policy. Disambiguating these two error types allows for targeted refinement of the actor's policy (i.e., representational errors require perceptual augmentation, while other errors can be reduced through methods such as improved training or attention support). We present a Bayesian inference algorithm for GEM and evaluate its utility in recovering representational errors on multiple domains. Results show that our approach can recover blind spots of both reinforcement learning agents as well as human users.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2021.

Builds on

20 of 51 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  2. 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 404
  3. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
  4. 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 298
  5. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
  6. 2018Near-Optimal Representation Learning for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
  7. 2017Third-Person Imitation Learningcited by 103
  8. 2018SDRL: Interpretable and Data-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Leveraging Symbolic Planningcited by 78
  9. 2017Learning human behaviors from motion capture by adversarial imitationcited by 77
  10. 2018Latent Space Policies for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 67
  11. 2018Modeling Others using Oneself in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  12. 2017Deep Object-Centric Representations for Generalizable Robot Learningcited by 50
8 more
  1. 2014Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPscited by 45
  2. 2017Shared Autonomy via Hindsight Optimization for Teleoperation and Teamingcited by 40
  3. 2019Coordinated Exploration via Intrinsic Rewards for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  4. 2013PEGASUS: A Policy Search Method for Large MDPs and POMDPscited by 22
  5. 2017The Value of Inferring the Internal State of Traffic Participants for Autonomous Freeway Drivingcited by 15
  6. 2018Universal Successor Representations for Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  7. 2018Object-sensitive Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  8. 2018Discovering Blind Spots in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.