mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Geometry of Over-parameterized Regression and Adversarial Perturbations

arXiv 2103.14108 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2021stat.ML cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classical regression has a simple geometric description in terms of a projection of the training labels onto the column space of the design matrix. However, for over-parameterized models -- where the number of fit parameters is large enough to perfectly fit the training data -- this picture becomes uninformative. Here, we present an alternative geometric interpretation of regression that applies to both under- and over-parameterized models. Unlike the classical picture which takes place in the space of training labels, our new picture resides in the space of input features. This new feature-based perspective provides a natural geometric interpretation of the double-descent phenomenon in the context of bias and variance, explaining why it can occur even in the absence of label noise. Furthermore, we show that adversarial perturbations -- small perturbations to the input features that result in large changes in label values -- are a generic feature of biased models, arising from the underlying geometry. We demonstrate these ideas by analyzing three minimal models for over-parameterized linear least squares regression: without basis functions (input features equal model features) and with linear or nonlinear basis functions (two-layer neural networks with linear or nonlinear activation functions, respectively).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2021.

Builds on

30 of 36 references.

References · 30

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  4. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  5. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  6. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  7. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  8. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  9. 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
  10. 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
  11. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
  12. 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
18 more
  1. 2017Optimal Errors and Phase Transitions in High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Modelscited by 115
  2. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  3. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  4. 2018An analytic theory of generalization dynamics and transfer learning in deep linear networkscited by 84
  5. 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
  6. 2020Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 75
  7. 2020A Random Matrix Analysis of Random Fourier Features: Beyond the Gaussian Kernel, a Precise Phase Transition, and the Corresponding Double Descentcited by 69
  8. 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 64
  9. 2020Implicit Regularization of Random Feature Modelscited by 54
  10. 2020A Brief Prehistory of Double Descentcited by 44
  11. 2019More Data Can Hurt for Linear Regression: Sample-wise Double Descentcited by 37
  12. 2019Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random designcited by 35
  13. 2020Analytic Study of Double Descent in Binary Classification: The Impact of Losscited by 28
  14. 2020What causes the test error? Going beyond bias-variance via ANOVAcited by 28
  15. 2020Memorizing without overfitting: Bias, variance, and interpolation in over-parameterized modelscited by 26
  16. 2019Understanding overfitting peaks in generalization error: Analytical risk curves for l2 and l1 penalized interpolationcited by 23
  17. 2020Benign Overfitting and Noisy Featurescited by 18
  18. 2019A New Look at an Old Problem: A Universal Learning Approach to Linear Regressioncited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.