mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FakeMix Augmentation Improves Transparent Object Detection

arXiv 2103.13279 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2021cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting transparent objects in natural scenes is challenging due to the low contrast in texture, brightness and colors. Recent deep-learning-based works reveal that it is effective to leverage boundaries for transparent object detection (TOD). However, these methods usually encounter boundary-related imbalance problem, leading to limited generation capability. Detailly, a kind of boundaries in the background, which share the same characteristics with boundaries of transparent objects but have much smaller amounts, usually hurt the performance. To conquer the boundary-related imbalance problem, we propose a novel content-dependent data augmentation method termed FakeMix. Considering collecting these trouble-maker boundaries in the background is hard without corresponding annotations, we elaborately generate them by appending the boundaries of transparent objects from other samples into the current image during training, which adjusts the data space and improves the generalization of the models. Further, we present AdaptiveASPP, an enhanced version of ASPP, that can capture multi-scale and cross-modality features dynamically. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our methods clearly outperform the state-of-the-art methods. We also show that our approach can also transfer well on related tasks, in which the model meets similar troubles, such as mirror detection, glass detection, and camouflaged object detection. Code will be made publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2021.

Builds on

24 of 32 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  8. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
  9. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  10. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  11. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  12. 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
12 more
  1. 2017ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Imagescited by 261
  2. 2019EGNet:Edge Guidance Network for Salient Object Detectioncited by 237
  3. 2016Deeply supervised salient object detection with short connectionscited by 196
  4. 2018OCNet: Object Context Network for Scene Parsingcited by 140
  5. 2020Segmenting Transparent Objects in the Wildcited by 98
  6. 2018DUNet: A deformable network for retinal vessel segmentationcited by 89
  7. 2018Learning to predict crisp boundariescited by 81
  8. 2020Learning Dynamic Routing for Semantic Segmentationcited by 79
  9. 2018Salient Objects in Clutter: Bringing Salient Object Detection to the Foregroundcited by 47
  10. 2018TOM-Net: Learning Transparent Object Matting from a Single Imagecited by 34
  11. 2020Dynamic Feature Integration for Simultaneous Detection of Salient Object, Edge and Skeletoncited by 34
  12. 2015TransCut: Transparent Object Segmentation from a Light-Field Imagecited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

7 papers.