mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safe Linear-Quadratic Dual Control with Almost Sure Performance Guarantee

arXiv 2103.13278 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2021eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper considers the linear-quadratic dual control problem where the system parameters need to be identified and the control objective needs to be optimized in the meantime. Contrary to existing works on data-driven linear-quadratic regulation, which typically provide error or regret bounds within a certain probability, we propose an online algorithm that guarantees the asymptotic optimality of the controller in the almost sure sense. Our dual control strategy consists of two parts: a switched controller with time-decaying exploration noise and Markov parameter inference based on the cross-correlation between the exploration noise and system output. Central to the almost sure performance guarantee is a safe switched control strategy that falls back to a known conservative but stable controller when the actual state deviates significantly from the target state. We prove that this switching strategy rules out any potential destabilizing controllers from being applied, while the performance gap between our switching strategy and the optimal linear state feedback is exponentially small. Under our dual control scheme, the parameter inference error scales as O(T-1/4+ε), while the suboptimality gap of control performance scales as O(T-1/2+ε), where T is the number of time steps, and ε is an arbitrarily small positive number. Simulation results on an industrial process example are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed strategy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2021.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  2. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 116
  3. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  4. 2018Non-asymptotic Identification of LTI Systems from a Single Trajectorycited by 78
  5. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 70
  6. 2017Finite Time Identification in Unstable Linear Systemscited by 66
  7. 2020Non-asymptotic Identification of Linear Dynamical Systems Using Multiple Trajectoriescited by 38
  8. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 35
  9. 2020Active Learning for Identification of Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 33
  10. 2018On Adaptive Linear-Quadratic Regulatorscited by 21
  11. 2018Input Perturbations for Adaptive Control and Learningcited by 18
  12. 2019Sample Complexity of Kalman Filtering for Unknown Systemscited by 12
6 more
  1. 2017Learning-based Control of Unknown Linear Systems with Thompson Samplingcited by 10
  2. 2018Finite Time Adaptive Stabilization of LQ Systemscited by 7
  3. 2019Randomized Algorithms for Data-Driven Stabilization of Stochastic Linear Systemscited by 6
  4. 2018Finite-Data Performance Guarantees for the Output-Feedback Control of an Unknown Systemcited by 4
  5. 2019An Online Approach to Physical Watermark Designcited by 3
  6. 2019Optimistic robust linear quadratic dual controlcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.