mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analyzing the Hidden Activations of Deep Policy Networks: Why Representation Matters

arXiv 2103.06398 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analyze the hidden activations of neural network policies of deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents and show, empirically, that it's possible to know a priori if a state representation will lend itself to fast learning. RL agents in high-dimensional states have two main learning burdens: (1) to learn an action-selection policy and (2) to learn to discern between useful and non-useful information in a given state. By learning a latent representation of these high-dimensional states with an auxiliary model, the latter burden is effectively removed, thereby leading to accelerated training progress. We examine this phenomenon across tasks in the PyBullet Kuka environment, where an agent must learn to control a robotic gripper to pick up an object. Our analysis reveals how neural network policies learn to organize their internal representation of the state space throughout training. The results from this analysis provide three main insights into how deep RL agents learn. First, a well-organized internal representation within the policy network is a prerequisite to learning good action-selection. Second, a poor initial representation can cause an unrecoverable collapse within a policy network. Third, a good initial representation allows an agent's policy network to organize its internal representation even before any training begins.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2021.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  2. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  5. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  6. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  7. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  8. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  9. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  10. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
  11. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
  12. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
12 more
  1. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  2. 2016Learning Hand-Eye Coordination for Robotic Grasping with Deep Learning and Large-Scale Data Collectioncited by 312
  3. 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 260
  4. 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
  5. 2019Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Ataricited by 144
  6. 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 125
  7. 2019Learning Predictive Models From Observation and Interactioncited by 41
  8. 2020Emergent Real-World Robotic Skills via Unsupervised Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  9. 2020Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Industrial Insertion Taskscited by 28
  10. 2015Correlational Neural Networkscited by 15
  11. 2016Path Integral Guided Policy Searchcited by 14
  12. 2018Intrinsically motivated reinforcement learning for human-robot interaction in the real-worldcited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.