mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Common Intuition to Transfer Learning Can Win or Lose: Case Studies for Linear Regression

arXiv 2103.05621 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study a fundamental transfer learning process from source to target linear regression tasks, including overparameterized settings where there are more learned parameters than data samples. The target task learning is addressed by using its training data together with the parameters previously computed for the source task. We define a transfer learning approach to the target task as a linear regression optimization with a regularization on the distance between the to-be-learned target parameters and the already-learned source parameters. We analytically characterize the generalization performance of our transfer learning approach and demonstrate its ability to resolve the peak in generalization errors in double descent phenomena of the minimum L2-norm solution to linear regression. Moreover, we show that for sufficiently related tasks, the optimally tuned transfer learning approach can outperform the optimally tuned ridge regression method, even when the true parameter vector conforms to an isotropic Gaussian prior distribution. Namely, we demonstrate that transfer learning can beat the minimum mean square error (MMSE) solution of the independent target task. Our results emphasize the ability of transfer learning to extend the solution space to the target task and, by that, to have an improved MMSE solution. We formulate the linear MMSE solution to our transfer learning setting and point out its key differences from the common design philosophy to transfer learning.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2021.

Builds on

29 of 44 references.

References · 29

  1. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  2. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  3. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
  4. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 634
  5. 2016Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networkscited by 612
  6. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  7. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 549
  8. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  9. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
  10. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
  11. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learningcited by 209
  12. 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 195
17 more
  1. 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 148
  2. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 127
  3. 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
  4. 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 109
  5. 2020Classification vs regression in overparameterized regimes: Does the loss function matter?cited by 97
  6. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  7. 2018An analytic theory of generalization dynamics and transfer learning in deep linear networkscited by 85
  8. 2019Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learningcited by 83
  9. 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
  10. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 67
  11. 2020The role of regularization in classification of high-dimensional noisy Gaussian mixturecited by 63
  12. 2020Analytic Study of Double Descent in Binary Classification: The Impact of Losscited by 28
  13. 2021Phase Transitions in Transfer Learning for High-Dimensional Perceptronscited by 22
  14. 2020Double Double Descent: On Generalization Errors in Transfer Learning between Linear Regression Taskscited by 16
  15. 2019WONDER: Weighted one-shot distributed ridge regression in high dimensionscited by 14
  16. 2020Subspace Fitting Meets Regression: The Effects of Supervision and Orthonormality Constraints on Double Descent of Generalization Errorscited by 11
  17. 2021Transfer Learning for Linear Regression: a Statistical Test of Gaincited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

6 papers.