Sparse LiDAR and Stereo Fusion (SLS-Fusion) for Depth Estimationand 3D Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability to accurately detect and localize objects is recognized as being the most important for the perception of self-driving cars. From 2D to 3D object detection, the most difficult is to determine the distance from the ego-vehicle to objects. Expensive technology like LiDAR can provide a precise and accurate depth information, so most studies have tended to focus on this sensor showing a performance gap between LiDAR-based methods and camera-based methods. Although many authors have investigated how to fuse LiDAR with RGB cameras, as far as we know there are no studies to fuse LiDAR and stereo in a deep neural network for the 3D object detection task. This paper presents SLS-Fusion, a new approach to fuse data from 4-beam LiDAR and a stereo camera via a neural network for depth estimation to achieve better dense depth maps and thereby improves 3D object detection performance. Since 4-beam LiDAR is cheaper than the well-known 64-beam LiDAR, this approach is also classified as a low-cost sensors-based method. Through evaluation on the KITTI benchmark, it is shown that the proposed method significantly improves depth estimation performance compared to a baseline method. Also, when applying it to 3D object detection, a new state of the art on low-cost sensor based method is achieved.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2021.
Builds on
23 of 27 references.
References · 23
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 878
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 721
- 2017Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 640
- 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 486
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
- 2016Deeper Depth Prediction with Fully Convolutional Residual Networkscited by 402
- 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
- 2017Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregationcited by 325
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2019Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 163
11 more
- 2018DeepLiDAR: Deep Surface Normal Guided Depth Prediction for Outdoor Scene from Sparse LiDAR Data and Single Color Imagecited by 129
- 2019Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detectioncited by 124
- 2019Monocular 3D Object Detection with Pseudo-LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 113
- 2020DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detectioncited by 100
- 2017Deep MANTA: A Coarse-to-fine Many-Task Network for joint 2D and 3D vehicle analysis from monocular imagecited by 95
- 2019Triangulation Learning Network: from Monocular to Stereo 3D Object Detectioncited by 40
- 2019Noise-Aware Unsupervised Deep Lidar-Stereo Fusioncited by 31
- 2019Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detectioncited by 29
- 2019Task-Aware Monocular Depth Estimation for 3D Object Detectioncited by 22
- 2020Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimationcited by 18
- 20193D LiDAR and Stereo Fusion using Stereo Matching Network with Conditional Cost Volume Normalizationcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.