mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Meta Learning Black-Box Population-Based Optimizers

arXiv 2103.03526 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The no free lunch theorem states that no model is better suited to every problem. A question that arises from this is how to design methods that propose optimizers tailored to specific problems achieving state-of-the-art performance. This paper addresses this issue by proposing the use of meta-learning to infer population-based black-box optimizers that can automatically adapt to specific classes of problems. We suggest a general modeling of population-based algorithms that result in Learning-to-Optimize POMDP (LTO-POMDP), a meta-learning framework based on a specific partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). From that framework's formulation, we propose to parameterize the algorithm using deep recurrent neural networks and use a meta-loss function based on stochastic algorithms' performance to train efficient data-driven optimizers over several related optimization tasks. The learned optimizers' performance based on this implementation is assessed on various black-box optimization tasks and hyperparameter tuning of machine learning models. Our results revealed that the meta-loss function encourages a learned algorithm to alter its search behavior so that it can easily fit into a new context. Thus, it allows better generalization and higher sample efficiency than state-of-the-art generic optimization algorithms, such as the Covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES).

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2021.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  3. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  5. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  6. 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
  7. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  8. 2019Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradientscited by 523
  9. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
  10. 2016Learning to reinforcement learncited by 369
  11. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 364
  12. 2017Deep Neuroevolution: Genetic Algorithms Are a Competitive Alternative for Training Deep Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learningcited by 148
10 more
  1. 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 135
  2. 2020Learning to Continually Learncited by 82
  3. 2019Meta reinforcement learning as task inferencecited by 75
  4. 2020Tasks, stability, architecture, and compute: Training more effective learned optimizers, and using them to train themselvescited by 57
  5. 2020Using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategiescited by 29
  6. 2018IOHprofiler: A Benchmarking and Profiling Tool for Iterative Optimization Heuristicscited by 28
  7. 2019Learning to Optimize in Swarmscited by 23
  8. 2020Quality Diversity for Multi-task Optimizationcited by 23
  9. 2019Meta-Surrogate Benchmarking for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 16
  10. 2020Exploring the Evolution of GANs through Quality Diversitycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort: