mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Successor Feature Sets: Generalizing Successor Representations Across Policies

arXiv 2103.02650 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Successor-style representations have many advantages for reinforcement learning: for example, they can help an agent generalize from past experience to new goals, and they have been proposed as explanations of behavioral and neural data from human and animal learners. They also form a natural bridge between model-based and model-free RL methods: like the former they make predictions about future experiences, and like the latter they allow efficient prediction of total discounted rewards. However, successor-style representations are not optimized to generalize across policies: typically, we maintain a limited-length list of policies, and share information among them by representation learning or GPI. Successor-style representations also typically make no provision for gathering information or reasoning about latent variables. To address these limitations, we bring together ideas from predictive state representations, belief space value iteration, successor features, and convex analysis: we develop a new, general successor-style representation, together with a Bellman equation that connects multiple sources of information within this representation, including different latent states, policies, and reward functions. The new representation is highly expressive: for example, it lets us efficiently read off an optimal policy for a new reward function, or a policy that imitates a new demonstration. For this paper, we focus on exact computation of the new representation in small, known environments, since even this restricted setting offers plenty of interesting questions. Our implementation does not scale to large, unknown environments -- nor would we expect it to, since it generalizes POMDP value iteration, which is difficult to scale. However, we believe that future work will allow us to extend our ideas to approximate reasoning in large, unknown environments.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2021.

Builds on

12 of 27 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
  2. 2019Fast Task Inference with Variational Intrinsic Successor Featurescited by 131
  3. 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
  4. 2019Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning Using Successor Features and Generalised Policy Improvementcited by 88
  5. 2017Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representationcited by 85
  6. 2016Deep Successor Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
  7. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning with Successor Features for Navigation across Similar Environmentscited by 50
  8. 2017Visual Semantic Planning using Deep Successor Representationscited by 45
  9. 2019Truly Batch Apprenticeship Learning with Deep Successor Featurescited by 27
  10. 2019A neurally plausible model learns successor representations in partially observable environmentscited by 12
  11. 2018Universal Successor Representations for Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  12. 2019A New Framework for Query Efficient Active Imitation Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

6 papers.