mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Asymptotic Risk of Overparameterized Likelihood Models: Double Descent Theory for Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2103.00500 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2021stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the asymptotic risk of a general class of overparameterized likelihood models, including deep models. The recent empirical success of large-scale models has motivated several theoretical studies to investigate a scenario wherein both the number of samples, n, and parameters, p, diverge to infinity and derive an asymptotic risk at the limit. However, these theorems are only valid for linear-in-feature models, such as generalized linear regression, kernel regression, and shallow neural networks. Hence, it is difficult to investigate a wider class of nonlinear models, including deep neural networks with three or more layers. In this study, we consider a likelihood maximization problem without the model constraints and analyze the upper bound of an asymptotic risk of an estimator with penalization. Technically, we combine a property of the Fisher information matrix with an extended Marchenko-Pastur law and associate the combination with empirical process techniques. The derived bound is general, as it describes both the double descent and the regularized risk curves, depending on the penalization. Our results are valid without the linear-in-feature constraints on models and allow us to derive the general spectral distributions of a Fisher information matrix from the likelihood. We demonstrate that several explicit models, such as parallel deep neural networks, ensemble learning, and residual networks, are in agreement with our theory. This result indicates that even large and deep models have a small asymptotic risk if they exhibit a specific structure, such as divisibility. To verify this finding, we conduct a real-data experiment with parallel deep neural networks. Our results expand the applicability of the asymptotic risk analysis, and may also contribute to the understanding and application of deep learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2021.

Builds on

30 of 49 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  3. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  4. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  5. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  6. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  7. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  8. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  9. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  10. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 391
  11. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  12. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
18 more
  1. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
  2. 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
  3. 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
  4. 2020Benign overfitting in ridge regressioncited by 152
  5. 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 146
  6. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  7. 2020On the Optimal Weighted ℓ2 Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 97
  8. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  9. 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
  10. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
  11. 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 64
  12. 2020Implicit Regularization of Random Feature Modelscited by 54
  13. 2020Kernel Alignment Risk Estimator: Risk Prediction from Training Datacited by 54
  14. 2018Optimal ridge penalty for real-world high-dimensional data can be zero or negative due to the implicit ridge regularizationcited by 52
  15. 2020A Brief Prehistory of Double Descentcited by 44
  16. 2019Approximation and Non-parametric Estimation of ResNet-type Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 40
  17. 2020Analytic Study of Double Descent in Binary Classification: The Impact of Losscited by 28
  18. 2020Subspace Fitting Meets Regression: The Effects of Supervision and Orthonormality Constraints on Double Descent of Generalization Errorscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.