Gradient-guided Loss Masking for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To mitigate the negative effect of low quality training data on the performance of neural machine translation models, most existing strategies focus on filtering out harmful data before training starts. In this paper, we explore strategies that dynamically optimize data usage during the training process using the model's gradients on a small set of clean data. At each training step, our algorithm calculates the gradient alignment between the training data and the clean data to mask out data with negative alignment. Our method has a natural intuition: good training data should update the model parameters in a similar direction as the clean data. Experiments on three WMT language pairs show that our method brings significant improvement over strong baselines, and the improvements are generalizable across test data from different domains.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2021.
Builds on
10 of 14 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
- 2020Balancing Training for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
- 2019Optimizing Data Usage via Differentiable Rewardscited by 48
- 2018Denoising Neural Machine Translation Training with Trusted Data and Online Data Selectioncited by 43
- 2018Dual Conditional Cross-Entropy Filtering of Noisy Parallel Corporacited by 40
- 2017Dynamic Data Selection for Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5.
8 papers.
- 2021Improving Multilingual Translation by Representation and Gradient Regularizationcited by 31
- 2022On the Domain Adaptation and Generalization of Pretrained Language Models: A Surveycited by 22
- 2021The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Modelscited by 14
- 2022Data Selection Curriculum for Neural Machine Translationcited by 11
- 2021On the Complementarity of Data Selection and Fine Tuning for Domain Adaptationcited by 10
- 2022Influence Functions for Sequence Tagging Modelscited by 9
- 2022Por Qu'e N~ao Utiliser Alla Spraak? Mixed Training with Gradient Optimization in Few-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 6
- 2022Switchable Representation Learning Framework with Self-compatibilitycited by 1
- 2022On the Domain Adaptation and Generalization of Pretrained Language Models: A Survey6 Nov 2022
- 2022Influence Functions for Sequence Tagging Models25 Oct 2022
- 2022Switchable Representation Learning Framework with Self-compatibility16 Jun 2022
- 2022Por Qu'e N~ao Utiliser Alla Spraak? Mixed Training with Gradient Optimization in Few-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer29 Apr 2022
- 2022Data Selection Curriculum for Neural Machine Translation25 Mar 2022
- 2021The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Models21 Sep 2021
- 2021On the Complementarity of Data Selection and Fine Tuning for Domain Adaptation15 Sep 2021
- 2021Improving Multilingual Translation by Representation and Gradient Regularization10 Sep 2021