mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Complementarity of Data Selection and Fine Tuning for Domain Adaptation

arXiv 2109.07591 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Domain adaptation of neural networks commonly relies on three training phases: pretraining, selected data training and then fine tuning. Data selection improves target domain generalization by training further on pretraining data identified by relying on a small sample of target domain data. This work examines the benefit of data selection for language modeling and machine translation. Our experiments assess the complementarity of selection with fine tuning and result in practical recommendations: (i) selected data must be similar to the fine-tuning domain but not so much as to erode the complementary effect of fine-tuning; (ii) there is a trade-off between selecting little data for fast but limited progress or much data for slow but long lasting progress; (iii) data selection can be applied early during pretraining, with performance gains comparable to long pretraining session; (iv) data selection from domain classifiers is often more effective than the popular contrastive data selection method.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.

Builds on

26 of 44 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  6. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  7. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  8. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  9. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  10. 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 367
  11. 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 302
  12. 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 251
14 more
  1. 2014Recurrent Neural Network Regularizationcited by 189
  2. 2020Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 160
  3. 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
  4. 2020Understanding and Improving Information Transfer in Multi-Task Learningcited by 113
  5. 2019Adaptation of Deep Bidirectional Multilingual Transformers for Russian Languagecited by 109
  6. 2018Denoising Neural Machine Translation Training with Trusted Data and Online Data Selectioncited by 43
  7. 2017Dynamic Data Selection for Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
  8. 2019Reinforcement Learning based Curriculum Optimization for Neural Machine Translationcited by 29
  9. 2020Dynamic Data Selection and Weighting for Iterative Back-Translationcited by 25
  10. 2019AutoSeM: Automatic Task Selection and Mixing in Multi-Task Learningcited by 22
  11. 2021Auxiliary Task Update Decomposition: The Good, The Bad and The Neutralcited by 17
  12. 2021Gradient-guided Loss Masking for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  13. 2018Reinforced Co-Trainingcited by 7
  14. 2019Scalable Evaluation and Improvement of Document Set Expansion via Neural Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

10 papers.