mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inductive Bias of Multi-Channel Linear Convolutional Networks with Bounded Weight Norm

arXiv 2102.12238 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We provide a function space characterization of the inductive bias resulting from minimizing the ℓ2 norm of the weights in multi-channel convolutional neural networks with linear activations and empirically test our resulting hypothesis on ReLU networks trained using gradient descent. We define an induced regularizer in the function space as the minimum ℓ2 norm of weights of a network required to realize a function. For two layer linear convolutional networks with C output channels and kernel size K, we show the following: (a) If the inputs to the network are single channeled, the induced regularizer for any K is independent of the number of output channels C. Furthermore, we derive the regularizer is a norm given by a semidefinite program (SDP). (b) In contrast, for multi-channel inputs, multiple output channels can be necessary to merely realize all matrix-valued linear functions and thus the inductive bias does depend on C. However, for sufficiently large C, the induced regularizer is again given by an SDP that is independent of C. In particular, the induced regularizer for K=1 and K=D (input dimension) is given in closed form as the nuclear norm and the ℓ2,1 group-sparse norm, respectively, of the Fourier coefficients of the linear predictor. We investigate the broader applicability of our theoretical results to implicit regularization from gradient descent on linear and ReLU networks through experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2021.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  2. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  3. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  4. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  5. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  6. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
  7. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  8. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  9. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
  10. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  11. 2018Gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networkscited by 182
  12. 2020Directional convergence and alignment in deep learningcited by 172
13 more
  1. 2020Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank Learningcited by 148
  2. 2018Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernelcited by 131
  3. 2020Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Normscited by 118
  4. 2019A Function Space View of Bounded Norm Infinite Width ReLU Nets: The Multivariate Casecited by 113
  5. 2019How do infinite width bounded norm networks look in function space?cited by 105
  6. 2020Neural Networks are Convex Regularizers: Exact Polynomial-time Convex Optimization Formulations for Two-layer Networkscited by 96
  7. 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 81
  8. 2020A Unifying View on Implicit Bias in Training Linear Neural Networkscited by 74
  9. 2020Revealing the Structure of Deep Neural Networks via Convex Dualitycited by 54
  10. 2019Lexicographic and Depth-Sensitive Margins in Homogeneous and Non-Homogeneous Deep Modelscited by 53
  11. 2019Identity Crisis: Memorization and Generalization under Extreme Overparameterizationcited by 33
  12. 2020Vector-output ReLU Neural Network Problems are Copositive Programs: Convex Analysis of Two Layer Networks and Polynomial-time Algorithmscited by 33
  13. 2020Can Implicit Bias Explain Generalization? Stochastic Convex Optimization as a Case Studycited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 6; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
  2. 2022Vision Transformers provably learn spatial structurecited by 92
  3. 2022On the Implicit Bias in Deep-Learning Algorithmscited by 84
  4. 2022Implicit Regularization Towards Rank Minimization in ReLU Networkscited by 53
  5. 2023Solving Regularized Exp, Cosh and Sinh Regression Problemscited by 44
  6. 2021On Margin Maximization in Linear and ReLU Networkscited by 34
  7. 2023A Mathematical Abstraction for Balancing the Trade-off Between Creativity and Reality in Large Language Modelscited by 29
  8. 2022Implicit Regularization in Hierarchical Tensor Factorization and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 27
  9. 2023Theoretical Analysis of Inductive Biases in Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 21
  10. 2023Function Space and Critical Points of Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 19
  11. 2021The Interplay Between Implicit Bias and Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Linear Networkscited by 18
  12. 2021Implicit Bias of Linear Equivariant Networkscited by 18
6 more
  1. 2024Guiding Neural Collapse: Optimising Towards the Nearest Simplex Equiangular Tight Framecited by 14
  2. 2022Deep Linear Networks can Benignly Overfit when Shallow Ones Docited by 8
  3. 2023Implicit Regularization for Group Sparsitycited by 8
  4. 2023On the Training Instability of Shuffling SGD with Batch Normalizationcited by 3
  5. 2022Testing predictions of representation cost theory with CNNscited by 0
  6. 2026Theoretical Analysis of Sparse Optimization with Reparameterization, Weight Decay, and Adaptive Learning Ratecited by 0