mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Implicit Bias Explain Generalization? Stochastic Convex Optimization as a Case Study

arXiv 2003.06152 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The notion of implicit bias, or implicit regularization, has been suggested as a means to explain the surprising generalization ability of modern-days overparameterized learning algorithms. This notion refers to the tendency of the optimization algorithm towards a certain structured solution that often generalizes well. Recently, several papers have studied implicit regularization and were able to identify this phenomenon in various scenarios. We revisit this paradigm in arguably the simplest non-trivial setup, and study the implicit bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in the context of Stochastic Convex Optimization. As a first step, we provide a simple construction that rules out the existence of a distribution-independent implicit regularizer that governs the generalization ability of SGD. We then demonstrate a learning problem that rules out a very general class of distribution-dependent implicit regularizers from explaining generalization, which includes strongly convex regularizers as well as non-degenerate norm-based regularizations. Certain aspects of our constructions point out to significant difficulties in providing a comprehensive explanation of an algorithm's generalization performance by solely arguing about its implicit regularization properties.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: