mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FlashEvaluator: Expanding Search Space with Parallel Sequence-Level Evaluation

arXiv 2603.02565 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Generator-Evaluator (G-E) framework generates K candidate sequences and uses an evaluator to select the highest-scoring one, which is widely used in recommender systems (RecSys) and natural language processing (NLP). Existing evaluators commonly score candidates independently. Although such evaluations can be batched, independent scoring neither models interactions among candidates nor eliminates repeated computation of request-level context and recurring candidate elements, causing the total evaluation work to grow approximately linearly with K. To handle with, we propose FlashEvaluator, a joint evaluator that scores all candidate sequences in a single forward pass. FlashEvaluator factorizes evaluation into shared request-level encoding, reusable candidate-side computation, sequence assembly by indexing, and cross-sequence interaction for setwise comparison. We call this request-local reuse scheme QKV-Cache: inspired by autoregressive KV caching, it reuses context-side key/value representations across candidate sequences and, when candidate elements recur, reuses their request-conditioned representations on the query side. In repeated-item settings, the dominant item-encoding cost therefore depends on the number of distinct items rather than their total occurrences across sequences, reducing the marginal cost of evaluating additional candidates. We provide a computational analysis and evaluate FlashEvaluator on recommendation and text summarization. The results show lower latency and higher throughput with competitive recommendation and summarization quality. In an online deployment at Kuaishou with K=50, FlashEvaluator reduces inference latency by 44% and increases QPS by 114% relative to the production baseline, while yielding statistically significant gains in retention, engagement, and ecosystem metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

39 of 77 references.

References · 39

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  7. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  8. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  9. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  10. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,311
  11. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  12. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
27 more
  1. 2024KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cachecited by 604
  2. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
  3. 2016Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filteringcited by 517
  4. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
  5. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  6. 2024Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative Recommendationscited by 184
  7. 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 141
  8. 2021SimCLS: A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Abstractive Summarizationcited by 131
  9. 2018Learning a Deep Listwise Context Model for Ranking Refinementcited by 62
  10. 2022Quality-Aware Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
  11. 2019SetRank: Learning a Permutation-Invariant Ranking Model for Information Retrievalcited by 48
  12. 2023Generative Flow Network for Listwise Recommendationcited by 19
  13. 2024Non-autoregressive Generative Models for Reranking Recommendationcited by 17
  14. 2021Revisit Recommender System in the Permutation Prospectivecited by 16
  15. 2021GRN: Generative Rerank Network for Context-wise Recommendationcited by 13
  16. 2022PEAR: Personalized Re-ranking with Contextualized Transformer for Recommendationcited by 12
  17. 2021Variation Control and Evaluation for Generative SlateRecommendationscited by 10
  18. 2022Multi-Level Interaction Reranking with User Behavior Historycited by 8
  19. 2020Generator and Critic: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Slate Re-ranking in E-commercecited by 7
  20. 2024RecFlow: An Industrial Full Flow Recommendation Datasetcited by 7
  21. 2025A Generative Re-ranking Model for List-level Multi-objective Optimization at Taobaocited by 6
  22. 2025NLGR: Utilizing Neighbor Lists for Generative Rerank in Personalized Recommendation Systemscited by 5
  23. 2024Contextual Generative Auction with Permutation-level Externalities for Online Advertisingcited by 3
  24. 2025Comprehensive List Generation for Multi-Generator Rerankingcited by 3
  25. 2024IFA: Interaction Fidelity Attention for Entire Lifelong Behaviour Sequence Modelingcited by 2
  26. 2025You Only Evaluate Once: A Tree-based Rerank Method at Meituancited by 2
  27. 2022JDRec: Practical Actor-Critic Framework for Online Combinatorial Recommender Systemcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025EncouRAGe: Evaluating RAG Local, Fast, and Reliable
  2. 2025GReF: A Unified Generative Framework for Efficient Reranking via Ordered Multi-token Prediction
  3. 2026LRanker: LLM Ranker for Massive Candidates ↗
  4. 2025Rank1: Test-Time Compute for Reranking in Information Retrieval
  5. 2026F-GRPO: Factorized Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Unified Candidate Generation and Ranking
  6. 2025Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Two-Stage Retrieval: FlashRank Reranking and Query Expansion
  7. 2025Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding
  8. 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems