Knowledge-aware Complementary Product Representation Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning product representations that reflect complementary relationship plays a central role in e-commerce recommender system. In the absence of the product relationships graph, which existing methods rely on, there is a need to detect the complementary relationships directly from noisy and sparse customer purchase activities. Furthermore, unlike simple relationships such as similarity, complementariness is asymmetric and non-transitive. Standard usage of representation learning emphasizes on only one set of embedding, which is problematic for modelling such properties of complementariness. We propose using knowledge-aware learning with dual product embedding to solve the above challenges. We encode contextual knowledge into product representation by multi-task learning, to alleviate the sparsity issue. By explicitly modelling with user bias terms, we separate the noise of customer-specific preferences from the complementariness. Furthermore, we adopt the dual embedding framework to capture the intrinsic properties of complementariness and provide geometric interpretation motivated by the classic separating hyperplane theory. Finally, we propose a Bayesian network structure that unifies all the components, which also concludes several popular models as special cases. The proposed method compares favourably to state-of-art methods, in downstream classification and recommendation tasks. We also develop an implementation that scales efficiently to a dataset with millions of items and customers.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Zero-shot Item-based Recommendation via Multi-task Product Knowledge Graph Pre-Trainingcited by 12
- 2022Towards High-Order Complementary Recommendation via Logical Reasoning Networkcited by 5
- 2021Theoretical Understandings of Product Embedding for E-commerce Machine Learningcited by 4
- 2022Causal Structure Learning with Recommendation Systemcited by 2
- 2022Mitigating Frequency Bias in Next-Basket Recommendation via Deconfounderscited by 1
- 2023Pretrained Embeddings for E-commerce Machine Learning: When it Fails and Why?cited by 1
- 2024Within-basket Recommendation via Neural Pattern Associatorcited by 1
- 2024Complementary Recommendation in E-commerce: Definition, Approaches, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2021Variational Inference for Category Recommendation in E-Commerce platformscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Co-purchase Relation: Evolution of Complementary Recommendations at Allegrocited by 0
- 2026Beyond Co-purchase Relation: Evolution of Complementary Recommendations at Allegro4 Sep 2026
- 2024Complementary Recommendation in E-commerce: Definition, Approaches, and Future Directions24 Mar 2024
- 2024Within-basket Recommendation via Neural Pattern Associator25 Jan 2024
- 2023Zero-shot Item-based Recommendation via Multi-task Product Knowledge Graph Pre-Training12 May 2023
- 2023Pretrained Embeddings for E-commerce Machine Learning: When it Fails and Why?9 Apr 2023
- 2022Towards High-Order Complementary Recommendation via Logical Reasoning Network9 Dec 2022
- 2022Mitigating Frequency Bias in Next-Basket Recommendation via Deconfounders16 Nov 2022
- 2022Causal Structure Learning with Recommendation System19 Oct 2022
- 2021Variational Inference for Category Recommendation in E-Commerce platforms15 Apr 2021
- 2021Theoretical Understandings of Product Embedding for E-commerce Machine Learning24 Feb 2021