mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EBMs Trained with Maximum Likelihood are Generator Models Trained with a Self-adverserial Loss

arXiv 2102.11757 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Maximum likelihood estimation is widely used in training Energy-based models (EBMs). Training requires samples from an unnormalized distribution, which is usually intractable, and in practice, these are obtained by MCMC algorithms such as Langevin dynamics. However, since MCMC in high-dimensional space converges extremely slowly, the current understanding of maximum likelihood training, which assumes approximate samples from the model can be drawn, is problematic. In this paper, we try to understand this training procedure by replacing Langevin dynamics with deterministic solutions of the associated gradient descent ODE. Doing so allows us to study the density induced by the dynamics (if the dynamics are invertible), and connect with GANs by treating the dynamics as generator models, the initial values as latent variables and the loss as optimizing a critic defined by the very same energy that determines the generator through its gradient. Hence the term - self-adversarial loss. We show that reintroducing the noise in the dynamics does not lead to a qualitative change in the behavior, and merely reduces the quality of the generator. We thus show that EBM training is effectively a self-adversarial procedure rather than maximum likelihood estimation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  4. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
  5. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  6. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  7. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 584
  8. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 364
  9. 2017GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibriumcited by 208
  10. 2016A Theory of Generative ConvNetcited by 174
  11. 2019Learning Non-Convergent Non-Persistent Short-Run MCMC Toward Energy-Based Modelcited by 147
  12. 2020Learning Energy-Based Models by Diffusion Recovery Likelihoodcited by 122
14 more
  1. 2019On the Anatomy of MCMC-Based Maximum Likelihood Learning of Energy-Based Modelscited by 105
  2. 2020VAEBM: A Symbiosis between Variational Autoencoders and Energy-based Modelscited by 103
  3. 2020Residual Energy-Based Models for Text Generationcited by 95
  4. 2020Convex Potential Flows: Universal Probability Distributions with Optimal Transport and Convex Optimizationcited by 89
  5. 2019Flow Contrastive Estimation of Energy-Based Modelscited by 75
  6. 2020Your GAN is Secretly an Energy-based Model and You Should use Discriminator Driven Latent Samplingcited by 71
  7. 2020Refining Deep Generative Models via Discriminator Gradient Flowcited by 45
  8. 2020Learning Energy-Based Model with Variational Auto-Encoder as Amortized Samplercited by 43
  9. 2018Monge-Amp`ere Flow for Generative Modelingcited by 33
  10. 2020Training Deep Energy-Based Models with f-Divergence Minimizationcited by 29
  11. 2019Learning Energy-Based Models in High-Dimensional Spaces with Multi-scale Denoising Score Matchingcited by 26
  12. 2020Generative VoxelNet: Learning Energy-Based Models for 3D Shape Synthesis and Analysiscited by 26
  13. 2020Discriminator Contrastive Divergence: Semi-Amortized Generative Modeling by Exploring Energy of the Discriminatorcited by 7
  14. 2020Exponential Tilting of Generative Models: Improving Sample Quality by Training and Sampling from Latent Energycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.