mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions

arXiv 2111.03782 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2021cs.LO cs.AI cs.SEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Closed-loop verification of cyber-physical systems with neural network controllers offers strong safety guarantees under certain assumptions. It is, however, difficult to determine whether these guarantees apply at run time because verification assumptions may be violated. To predict safety violations in a verified system, we propose a three-step confidence composition (CoCo) framework for monitoring verification assumptions. First, we represent the sufficient condition for verified safety with a propositional logical formula over assumptions. Second, we build calibrated confidence monitors that evaluate the probability that each assumption holds. Third, we obtain the confidence in the verification guarantees by composing the assumption monitors using a composition function suitable for the logical formula. Our CoCo framework provides theoretical bounds on the calibration and conservatism of compositional monitors. Two case studies show that compositional monitors are calibrated better than their constituents and successfully predict safety violations.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.

Builds on

14 of 54 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  3. 2020NNV: The Neural Network Verification Tool for Deep Neural Networks and Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 128
  4. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 84
  5. 2018Probabilistically Safe Robot Planning with Confidence-Based Human Predictionscited by 28
  6. 2018SOTER: A Runtime Assurance Framework for Programming Safe Robotics Systemscited by 25
  7. 2020PAC Confidence Predictions for Deep Neural Network Classifierscited by 21
  8. 2021ReSonAte: A Runtime Risk Assessment Framework for Autonomous Systemscited by 9
  9. 2020Quantifying Assurance in Learning-enabled Systemscited by 4
  10. 2018Verified Runtime Validation for Partially Observable Hybrid Systemscited by 3
  11. 2021Assurance Monitoring of Learning Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems Using Inductive Conformal Prediction based on Distance Learningcited by 3
  12. 2016Monitoring Assumptions in Assume-Guarantee Contractscited by 1
2 more
  1. 2021ModelGuard: Runtime Validation of Lipschitz-continuous Modelscited by 1
  2. 2021Improving Prediction Confidence in Learning-Enabled Autonomous Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

6 papers.