mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jacobian Determinant of Normalizing Flows

arXiv 2102.06539 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Normalizing flows learn a diffeomorphic mapping between the target and base distribution, while the Jacobian determinant of that mapping forms another real-valued function. In this paper, we show that the Jacobian determinant mapping is unique for the given distributions, hence the likelihood objective of flows has a unique global optimum. In particular, the likelihood for a class of flows is explicitly expressed by the eigenvalues of the auto-correlation matrix of individual data point, and independent of the parameterization of neural network, which provides a theoretical optimal value of likelihood objective and relates to probabilistic PCA. Additionally, Jacobian determinant is a measure of local volume change and is maximized when MLE is used for optimization. To stabilize normalizing flows training, it is required to maintain a balance between the expansiveness and contraction of volume, meaning Lipschitz constraint on the diffeomorphic mapping and its inverse. With these theoretical results, several principles of designing normalizing flow were proposed. And numerical experiments on highdimensional datasets (such as CelebA-HQ 1024x1024) were conducted to show the improved stability of training.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2021.

Builds on

33 of 39 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  5. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  6. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  7. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  8. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  9. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  10. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  11. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  12. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 825
21 more
  1. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
  2. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
  3. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
  4. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 584
  5. 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 396
  6. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 364
  7. 2019Flow++: Improving Flow-Based Generative Models with Variational Dequantization and Architecture Designcited by 258
  8. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 256
  9. 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
  10. 2018Neural Importance Samplingcited by 154
  11. 2020OT-Flow: Fast and Accurate Continuous Normalizing Flows via Optimal Transportcited by 143
  12. 2020Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximatorscited by 85
  13. 2018Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Variational Inferencecited by 71
  14. 2020Augmented Normalizing Flows: Bridging the Gap Between Generative Flows and Latent Variable Modelscited by 66
  15. 2019Approximation Capabilities of Neural ODEs and Invertible Residual Networkscited by 56
  16. 2020The Expressive Power of a Class of Normalizing Flow Modelscited by 35
  17. 2018Monge-Amp`ere Flow for Generative Modelingcited by 33
  18. 2019Potential Flow Generator with L2 Optimal Transport Regularity for Generative Modelscited by 31
  19. 2020Representational aspects of depth and conditioning in normalizing flowscited by 25
  20. 2020Gaussianization Flowscited by 20
  21. 2019Generative Model with Dynamic Linear Flowcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

8 papers.