mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws

arXiv 2305.16846 ↗First posted 26 May 2023cs.LG physics.data-an physics.flu-dyncited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Lagrangian Flow Networks (LFlows) for modeling fluid densities and velocities continuously in space and time. By construction, the proposed LFlows satisfy the continuity equation, a PDE describing mass conservation in its differentiable form. Our model is based on the insight that solutions to the continuity equation can be expressed as time-dependent density transformations via differentiable and invertible maps. This follows from classical theory of the existence and uniqueness of Lagrangian flows for smooth vector fields. Hence, we model fluid densities by transforming a base density with parameterized diffeomorphisms conditioned on time. The key benefit compared to methods relying on numerical ODE solvers or PINNs is that the analytic expression of the velocity is always consistent with changes in density. Furthermore, we require neither expensive numerical solvers, nor additional penalties to enforce the PDE. LFlows show higher predictive accuracy in density modeling tasks compared to competing models in 2D and 3D, while being computationally efficient. As a real-world application, we model bird migration based on sparse weather radar measurements.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

Builds on

31 of 59 references.

References · 31

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  5. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  6. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  7. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  8. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
  9. 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
  10. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  11. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  12. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
19 more
  1. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  2. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  3. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 257
  4. 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
  5. 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 208
  6. 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 206
  7. 2018Measuring the Effects of Data Parallelism on Neural Network Trainingcited by 193
  8. 2020OT-Flow: Fast and Accurate Continuous Normalizing Flows via Optimal Transportcited by 143
  9. 2021Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEscited by 101
  10. 2020Neural Spatio-Temporal Point Processescited by 93
  11. 2019Unconstrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 92
  12. 2022Neural Conservation Laws: A Divergence-Free Perspectivecited by 70
  13. 2019Autoregressive Energy Machinescited by 23
  14. 2021Invertible DenseNets with Concatenated LipSwishcited by 17
  15. 2023Self-Consistent Velocity Matching of Probability Flowscited by 17
  16. 2019Semi-Conditional Normalizing Flows for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 15
  17. 2021Jacobian Determinant of Normalizing Flowscited by 8
  18. 2022Mesh-free Eulerian Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 4
  19. 2022Physics-informed inference of aerial animal movements from weather radar datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.