mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Decentralized Approach towards Responsible AI in Social Ecosystems

arXiv 2102.06362 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2021cs.CY cs.AI cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For AI technology to fulfill its full promises, we must have effective means to ensure Responsible AI behavior and curtail potential irresponsible use, e.g., in areas of privacy protection, human autonomy, robustness, and prevention of biases and discrimination in automated decision making. Recent literature in the field has identified serious shortcomings of narrow technology focused and formalism-oriented research and has proposed an interdisciplinary approach that brings the social context into the scope of study. In this paper, we take a sociotechnical approach to propose a more expansive framework of thinking about the Responsible AI challenges in both technical and social context. Effective solutions need to bridge the gap between a technical system with the social system that it will be deployed to. To this end, we propose human agency and regulation as main mechanisms of intervention and propose a decentralized computational infrastructure, or a set of public utilities, as the computational means to bridge this gap. A decentralized infrastructure is uniquely suited for meeting this challenge and enable technical solutions and social institutions in a mutually reinforcing dynamic to achieve Responsible AI goals. Our approach is novel in its sociotechnical approach and its aim in tackling the structural issues that cannot be solved within the narrow confines of AI technical research. We then explore possible features of the proposed infrastructure and discuss how it may help solve example problems recently studied in the field.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2021.

Builds on

18 of 74 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  5. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  6. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  7. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
  8. 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
  9. 2020Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influencecited by 27
  10. 2019(Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the Fieldcited by 23
  11. 2019The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Developmentcited by 21
  12. 2019Decentralized & Collaborative AI on Blockchaincited by 21
6 more
  1. 2018Ekiden: A Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contract Executioncited by 7
  2. 2019Multiple Purposes, Multiple Problems: A User Study of Consent Dialogs after GDPRcited by 6
  3. 2021AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Riskscited by 6
  4. 2018A Survey on Essential Components of a Self-Sovereign Identitycited by 4
  5. 2020Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research Viewcited by 4
  6. 2019Dynamic Algorithmic Service Agreements Perspectivecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3.

3 papers.