mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Unified and Stable Risk Minimization Framework for Weakly Supervised Learning with Theoretical Guarantees

arXiv 2511.22823 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weakly supervised learning has emerged as a practical alternative to fully supervised learning when complete and accurate labels are costly or infeasible to acquire. However, many existing methods are tailored to specific supervision patterns -- such as positive-unlabeled (PU), unlabeled-unlabeled (UU), complementary-label (CLL), partial-label (PLL), or similarity-unlabeled annotations -- and rely on post-hoc corrections to mitigate instability induced by indirect supervision. We propose a principled, unified framework that bypasses such post-hoc adjustments by directly formulating a stable surrogate risk grounded in the structure of weakly supervised data. The formulation naturally subsumes diverse settings -- including PU, UU, CLL, PLL, multi-class unlabeled, and tuple-based learning -- under a single optimization objective. We further establish a non-asymptotic generalization bound via Rademacher complexity that clarifies how supervision structure, model capacity, and sample size jointly govern performance. Beyond this, we analyze the effect of class-prior misspecification on the bound, deriving explicit terms that quantify its impact, and we study identifiability, giving sufficient conditions -- most notably via supervision stratification across groups -- under which the target risk is recoverable. Extensive experiments show consistent gains across class priors, dataset scales, and class counts -- without heuristic stabilization -- while exhibiting robustness to overfitting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2025.

Builds on

22 of 51 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  4. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  5. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  6. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  7. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
  8. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  9. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  10. 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
  11. 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
  12. 2018On the Minimal Supervision for Training Any Binary Classifier from Only Unlabeled Datacited by 43
10 more
  1. 2022Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspectivecited by 38
  2. 2018Classification from Pairwise Similarity and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
  3. 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
  4. 2019Classification from Pairwise Similarities/Dissimilarities and Unlabeled Data via Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 21
  5. 2021Text Compression-aided Transformer Encodingcited by 13
  6. 2021Learning with Proper Partial Labelscited by 8
  7. 2022Multi-class Classification from Multiple Unlabeled Datasets with Partial Risk Regularizationcited by 6
  8. 2024Auxiliary Tasks Enhanced Dual-affinity Learning for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 3
  9. 2023Defect detection using weakly supervised learningcited by 2
  10. 2024Sentinel-1 SAR Based Weakly Supervised Learning For Tropical Forest Mappingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.