Benford's law: what does it say on adversarial images?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are fragile to small perturbations in the input images. These networks are thus prone to malicious attacks that perturb the inputs to force a misclassification. Such slightly manipulated images aimed at deceiving the classifier are known as adversarial images. In this work, we investigate statistical differences between natural images and adversarial ones. More precisely, we show that employing a proper image transformation and for a class of adversarial attacks, the distribution of the leading digit of the pixels in adversarial images deviates from Benford's law. The stronger the attack, the more distant the resulting distribution is from Benford's law. Our analysis provides a detailed investigation of this new approach that can serve as a basis for alternative adversarial example detection methods that do not need to modify the original CNN classifier neither work on the raw high-dimensional pixels as features to defend against attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
10 more
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
- 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 263
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
- 2018SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systemscited by 152
- 2017SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustlycited by 76
- 2019ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attributioncited by 48
- 2018On the Geometry of Adversarial Examplescited by 43
- 2020Two-stream Encoder-Decoder Network for Localizing Image Forgeriescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.