mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of the Optimization Landscape of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Control

arXiv 2102.04393 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2021math.OC cs.SY eess.SYcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper revisits the classical Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control from a modern optimization perspective. We analyze two aspects of the optimization landscape of the LQG problem: 1) connectivity of the set of stabilizing controllers Cn; and 2) structure of stationary points. It is known that similarity transformations do not change the input-output behavior of a dynamical controller or LQG cost. This inherent symmetry by similarity transformations makes the landscape of LQG very rich. We show that 1) the set of stabilizing controllers Cn has at most two path-connected components and they are diffeomorphic under a mapping defined by a similarity transformation; 2) there might exist many strictly suboptimal stationary points of the LQG cost function over Cn and these stationary points are always non-minimal; 3) all minimal stationary points are globally optimal and they are identical up to a similarity transformation. These results shed some light on the performance analysis of direct policy gradient methods for solving the LQG problem.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 6; 2023: 10; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Neural Operators of Backstepping Controller and Observer Gain Functions for Reaction-Diffusion PDEscited by 16
  2. 2021Recurrent Neural Network Controllers Synthesis with Stability Guarantees for Partially Observed Systemscited by 15
  3. 2023Robot Fleet Learning via Policy Mergingcited by 11
  4. 2022Neural System Level Synthesis: Learning over All Stabilizing Policies for Nonlinear Systemscited by 10
  5. 2023Learning the Kalman Filter with Fine-Grained Sample Complexitycited by 9
  6. 2023Revisiting LQR Control from the Perspective of Receding-Horizon Policy Gradientcited by 9
  7. 2024Learning to Boost the Performance of Stable Nonlinear Systemscited by 7
  8. 2022How are policy gradient methods affected by the limits of control?cited by 6
  9. 2022Towards a Theoretical Foundation of Policy Optimization for Learning Control Policiescited by 6
  10. 2022Global Convergence of Direct Policy Search for State-Feedback H_∞ Robust Control: A Revisit of Nonsmooth Synthesis with Goldstein Subdifferentialcited by 6
  11. 2023Global Convergence of Receding-Horizon Policy Search in Learning Estimator Designscited by 4
  12. 2023Controlgym: Large-Scale Control Environments for Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 4
11 more
  1. 2026Non-Uniform Noise-to-Signal Ratio in the REINFORCE Policy-Gradient Estimatorcited by 4
  2. 2023Optimization Landscape of Policy Gradient Methods for Discrete-time Static Output Feedbackcited by 2
  3. 2023Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimizationcited by 2
  4. 2024Mollification Effects of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 2
  5. 2022On the Optimization Landscape of Dynamic Output Feedback: A Case Study for Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 1
  6. 2023On the Hardness of Learning to Stabilize Linear Systemscited by 1
  7. 2022Efficient Reinforcement Learning Through Trajectory Generationcited by 0
  8. 2023Accelerated Optimization Landscape of Linear-Quadratic Regulatorcited by 0
  9. 2024Model-Free μ-Synthesis: A Nonsmooth Optimization Perspectivecited by 0
  10. 2024Principles of frugal inference and controlcited by 0
  11. 2026Model-Free Output Feedback Stabilization via Policy Gradient Methodscited by 0