Optimization Landscape of Policy Gradient Methods for Discrete-time Static Output Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent times, significant advancements have been made in delving into the optimization landscape of policy gradient methods for achieving optimal control in linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. Compared with state-feedback control, output-feedback control is more prevalent since the underlying state of the system may not be fully observed in many practical settings. This paper analyzes the optimization landscape inherent to policy gradient methods when applied to static output feedback (SOF) control in discrete-time LTI systems subject to quadratic cost. We begin by establishing crucial properties of the SOF cost, encompassing coercivity, L-smoothness, and M-Lipschitz continuous Hessian. Despite the absence of convexity, we leverage these properties to derive novel findings regarding convergence (and nearly dimension-free rate) to stationary points for three policy gradient methods, including the vanilla policy gradient method, the natural policy gradient method, and the Gauss-Newton method. Moreover, we provide proof that the vanilla policy gradient method exhibits linear convergence towards local minima when initialized near such minima. The paper concludes by presenting numerical examples that validate our theoretical findings. These results not only characterize the performance of gradient descent for optimizing the SOF problem but also provide insights into the effectiveness of general policy gradient methods within the realm of reinforcement learning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.
Builds on
19 of 48 references.
References · 19
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 241
- 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
- 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 146
- 2019Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policiescited by 117
- 2020Distributional Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for Addressing Value Estimation Errorscited by 80
- 2018Derivative-Free Methods for Policy Optimization: Guarantees for Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 56
- 2020Policy Gradient Methods for the Noisy Linear Quadratic Regulator over a Finite Horizoncited by 43
- 2019LQR through the Lens of First Order Methods: Discrete-time Casecited by 30
- 2021Integrated Decision and Control: Towards Interpretable and Computationally Efficient Driving Intelligencecited by 25
7 more
- 2021Analysis of the Optimization Landscape of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Controlcited by 23
- 2019Learning the Globally Optimal Distributed LQ Regulatorcited by 19
- 2020Optimizing Static Linear Feedback: Gradient Methodcited by 19
- 2020Sample Complexity of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Control for Output Feedback Systemscited by 15
- 2022On the Optimization Landscape of Dynamic Output Feedback Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 8
- 2019On Topological and Metrical Properties of Stabilizing Feedback Gains: the MIMO Casecited by 6
- 2019Relaxed Actor-Critic with Convergence Guarantees for Continuous-Time Optimal Control of Nonlinear Systemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.