mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Incremental Beam Manipulation for Natural Language Generation

arXiv 2102.02574 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of natural language generation systems has improved substantially with modern neural networks. At test time they typically employ beam search to avoid locally optimal but globally suboptimal predictions. However, due to model errors, a larger beam size can lead to deteriorating performance according to the evaluation metric. For this reason, it is common to rerank the output of beam search, but this relies on beam search to produce a good set of hypotheses, which limits the potential gains. Other alternatives to beam search require changes to the training of the model, which restricts their applicability compared to beam search. This paper proposes incremental beam manipulation, i.e. reranking the hypotheses in the beam during decoding instead of only at the end. This way, hypotheses that are unlikely to lead to a good final output are discarded, and in their place hypotheses that would have been ignored will be considered instead. Applying incremental beam manipulation leads to an improvement of 1.93 and 5.82 BLEU points over vanilla beam search for the test sets of the E2E and WebNLG challenges respectively. The proposed method also outperformed a strong reranker by 1.04 BLEU points on the E2E challenge, while being on par with it on the WebNLG dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2021.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  2. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  3. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 252
  4. 2017Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translationcited by 232
  5. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  6. 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 126
  7. 2018Correcting Length Bias in Neural Machine Translationcited by 119
  8. 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
  9. 2019Evaluating the State-of-the-Art of End-to-End Natural Language Generation: The E2E NLG Challengecited by 86
  10. 2015Learning to Search Better Than Your Teachercited by 50
  11. 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Generation for Spoken Dialogue via Deep Syntax Trees and Stringscited by 27
  12. 2017Trainable Greedy Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
6 more
  1. 2015Stochastic Language Generation in Dialogue using Recurrent Neural Networks with Convolutional Sentence Rerankingcited by 17
  2. 2019Leveraging Sentence Similarity in Natural Language Generation: Improving Beam Search using Range Votingcited by 15
  3. 2019A Fully Differentiable Beam Search Decodercited by 14
  4. 2017A Continuous Relaxation of Beam Search for End-to-end Training of Neural Sequence Modelscited by 10
  5. 2018Learning Beam Search Policies via Imitation Learningcited by 9
  6. 2018Char2char Generation with Reranking for the E2E NLG Challengecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

6 papers.