mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved Cooperation by Exploiting a Common Signal

arXiv 2102.02304 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2021cs.MA cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Can artificial agents benefit from human conventions? Human societies manage to successfully self-organize and resolve the tragedy of the commons in common-pool resources, in spite of the bleak prediction of non-cooperative game theory. On top of that, real-world problems are inherently large-scale and of low observability. One key concept that facilitates human coordination in such settings is the use of conventions. Inspired by human behavior, we investigate the learning dynamics and emergence of temporal conventions, focusing on common-pool resources. Extra emphasis was given in designing a realistic evaluation setting: (a) environment dynamics are modeled on real-world fisheries, (b) we assume decentralized learning, where agents can observe only their own history, and (c) we run large-scale simulations (up to 64 agents). Uncoupled policies and low observability make cooperation hard to achieve; as the number of agents grow, the probability of taking a correct gradient direction decreases exponentially. By introducing an arbitrary common signal (e.g., date, time, or any periodic set of numbers) as a means to couple the learning process, we show that temporal conventions can emerge and agents reach sustainable harvesting strategies. The introduction of the signal consistently improves the social welfare (by 258% on average, up to 3306%), the range of environmental parameters where sustainability can be achieved (by 46% on average, up to 300%), and the convergence speed in low abundance settings (by 13% on average, up to 53%).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.

Builds on

18 of 57 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
  4. 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
  5. 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  6. 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
  7. 2017A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriationcited by 68
  8. 2019On the Pitfalls of Measuring Emergent Communicationcited by 66
  9. 2017RLlib: Abstractions for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  10. 2017Prosocial learning agents solve generalized Stag Hunts better than selfish onescited by 47
  11. 2018Evolving intrinsic motivations for altruistic behaviorcited by 30
  12. 2019A Hitchhiker's Guide to Statistical Comparisons of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 26
6 more
  1. 2020Multi Type Mean Field Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  2. 2017Consequentialist conditional cooperation in social dilemmas with imperfect informationcited by 23
  3. 2018Playing Atari with Six Neuronscited by 11
  4. 2014Decentralized Anti-coordination Through Multi-agent Learningcited by 4
  5. 2020Silly rules improve the capacity of agents to learn stable enforcement and compliance behaviorscited by 3
  6. 2015Learning Efficient Correlated Equilibriacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.