"It became a self-fulfilling prophecy": How Lived Experiences are Entangled with AI Predictions in Menstrual Cycle Tracking Apps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In menstrual cycle tracking apps (MCTAs), AI-based predictions and insights have become increasingly popular. These features enable users to receive personalized information about their bodies and mental states. However, there is currently little research on how these predictive AI features and explanations affect users' lived experiences. This paper examines human-AI entanglement in MCTAs through 14 semi-structured user interviews and a group autoethnography. These methods uncover the processes leading to this phenomenon. Our results reveal that: (1) users understand their lived experiences in light of AI predictions, although these predictions can be faulty due to imperfect logging practices, (2) the user interface features and AI explanations do not support awareness or critical engagement with this entanglement and meaning-making, and (3) non-normative MCTA users report a sense of isolation in this entangled interaction. Based on our findings, we propose design implications for predictive AI features and explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 76 references.
References · 11
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
- 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
- 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
- 2021To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 118
- 2019How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trustcited by 44
- 2022Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) from a user perspective- A synthesis of prior literature and problematizing avenues for future researchcited by 20
- 2024How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Surveycited by 5
- 2021Personalization Paradox in Behavior Change Apps: Lessons from a Social Comparison-Based Personalized App for Physical Activitycited by 2
- 2025The Centers and Margins of Modeling Humans in Well-being Technologies: A Decentering Approachcited by 2
- 2025AI Solutionism and Digital Self-Tracking with Wearablescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.