mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Injustices: Towards a Relational Ethics

arXiv 1912.07376 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2019cs.CYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It has become trivial to point out how decision-making processes in various social, political and economical sphere are assisted by automated systems. Improved efficiency, the hallmark of these systems, drives the mass scale integration of automated systems into daily life. However, as a robust body of research in the area of algorithmic injustice shows, algorithmic tools embed and perpetuate societal and historical biases and injustice. In particular, a persistent recurring trend within the literature indicates that society's most vulnerable are disproportionally impacted. When algorithmic injustice and bias is brought to the fore, most of the solutions on offer 1) revolve around technical solutions and 2) do not focus centre disproportionally impacted groups. This paper zooms out and draws the bigger picture. It 1) argues that concerns surrounding algorithmic decision making and algorithmic injustice require fundamental rethinking above and beyond technical solutions, and 2) outlines a way forward in a manner that centres vulnerable groups through the lens of relational ethics.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

11 papers.