mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Differentially Private Nature of Perturbed Gradient Descent

arXiv 2101.06847 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of empirical risk minimization given a database, using the gradient descent algorithm. We note that the function to be optimized may be non-convex, consisting of saddle points which impede the convergence of the algorithm. A perturbed gradient descent algorithm is typically employed to escape these saddle points. We show that this algorithm, that perturbs the gradient, inherently preserves the privacy of the data. We then employ the differential privacy framework to quantify the privacy hence achieved. We also analyze the change in privacy with varying parameters such as problem dimension and the distance between the databases.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2021.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  3. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
  4. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
  5. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
  6. 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 241
  7. 2018On the Power of Over-parametrization in Neural Networks with Quadratic Activationcited by 102
  8. 2018Escaping Saddles with Stochastic Gradientscited by 66
  9. 2017Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectivescited by 61
  10. 2016The Power of Normalization: Faster Evasion of Saddle Pointscited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.