mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Invariant Representation for Continual Learning

arXiv 2101.06162 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual learning aims to provide intelligent agents that are capable of learning continually a sequence of tasks, building on previously learned knowledge. A key challenge in this learning paradigm is catastrophically forgetting previously learned tasks when the agent faces a new one. Current rehearsal-based methods show their success in mitigating the catastrophic forgetting problem by replaying samples from previous tasks during learning a new one. However, these methods are infeasible when the data of previous tasks is not accessible. In this work, we propose a new pseudo-rehearsal-based method, named learning Invariant Representation for Continual Learning (IRCL), in which class-invariant representation is disentangled from a conditional generative model and jointly used with class-specific representation to learn the sequential tasks. Disentangling the shared invariant representation helps to learn continually a sequence of tasks, while being more robust to forgetting and having better knowledge transfer. We focus on class incremental learning where there is no knowledge about task identity during inference. We empirically evaluate our proposed method on two well-known benchmarks for continual learning: split MNIST and split Fashion MNIST. The experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms regularization-based methods by a big margin and is better than the state-of-the-art pseudo-rehearsal-based method. Finally, we analyze the role of the shared invariant representation in mitigating the forgetting problem especially when the number of replayed samples for each previous task is small.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2021.

Builds on

24 of 32 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  5. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
  6. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  7. 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,152
  8. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
  9. 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
  10. 2017Lifelong Learning with Dynamically Expandable Networkscited by 689
  11. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
  12. 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 562
12 more
  1. 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 511
  2. 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 376
  3. 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 359
  4. 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 359
  5. 2018cGANs with Projection Discriminatorcited by 253
  6. 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
  7. 2018Towards Robust Evaluations of Continual Learningcited by 148
  8. 2020Adversarial Continual Learningcited by 140
  9. 2020SpaceNet: Make Free Space For Continual Learningcited by 53
  10. 2019Auto-Embedding Generative Adversarial Networks for High Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 11
  11. 2016Online Contrastive Divergence with Generative Replay: Experience Replay without Storing Datacited by 9
  12. 2019A Cyclically-Trained Adversarial Network for Invariant Representation Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.