mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causal Gradient Boosting: Boosted Instrumental Variable Regression

arXiv 2101.06078 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2021econ.EM stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in the literature have demonstrated that standard supervised learning algorithms are ill-suited for problems with endogenous explanatory variables. To correct for the endogeneity bias, many variants of nonparameteric instrumental variable regression methods have been developed. In this paper, we propose an alternative algorithm called boostIV that builds on the traditional gradient boosting algorithm and corrects for the endogeneity bias. The algorithm is very intuitive and resembles an iterative version of the standard 2SLS estimator. Moreover, our approach is data driven, meaning that the researcher does not have to make a stance on neither the form of the target function approximation nor the choice of instruments. We demonstrate that our estimator is consistent under mild conditions. We carry out extensive Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the finite sample performance of our algorithm compared to other recently developed methods. We show that boostIV is at worst on par with the existing methods and on average significantly outperforms them.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2021.

Builds on

5 of 36 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Kernel Instrumental Variable Regressioncited by 118
  3. 2019Deep Generalized Method of Moments for Instrumental Variable Analysiscited by 88
  4. 2017Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effectscited by 76
  5. 2019Dual Instrumental Variable Regressioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.